A qualitative report on metacognitive training (MCT) for people with schizophrenia

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Vanessa Acuña, María Guerra, Orlando Toledo, Matías Cobaisse, Javier Silva, Álvaro Cavieres
{"title":"A qualitative report on metacognitive training (MCT) for people with schizophrenia","authors":"Vanessa Acuña,&nbsp;María Guerra,&nbsp;Orlando Toledo,&nbsp;Matías Cobaisse,&nbsp;Javier Silva,&nbsp;Álvaro Cavieres","doi":"10.1002/capr.12846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis is a psychological intervention that blends cognitive behavioural therapy and psychoeducation. Several published systematic reviews and meta-analyses have provided robust evidence of its efficacy. However, patients' opinions regarding the intervention or their own perception of the changes achieved have been overlooked. This study synthesises the first-person reports of people with schizophrenia who completed MCT at the Hospital Del Salvador de Valparaiso.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study employed a qualitative methodology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who completed MCT. The interviews were reliably transcribed, and a content analysis was performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All the participants interviewed were positive about MCT, highlighting improvements in various aspects and emphasising factors that contributed to the changes achieved. Four main themes emerged from the analysis: <i>Sowing the seeds of doubt</i>; <i>Significant changes in MCT attendees</i>; <i>Community formation;</i> and <i>What the MCT needs to improve</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results provide an in-depth report on MCT from the users' perspective and allow reflection on new outcomes to be studied in the future, with quantitative and qualitative methods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12846","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis is a psychological intervention that blends cognitive behavioural therapy and psychoeducation. Several published systematic reviews and meta-analyses have provided robust evidence of its efficacy. However, patients' opinions regarding the intervention or their own perception of the changes achieved have been overlooked. This study synthesises the first-person reports of people with schizophrenia who completed MCT at the Hospital Del Salvador de Valparaiso.

Methods

This study employed a qualitative methodology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who completed MCT. The interviews were reliably transcribed, and a content analysis was performed.

Results

All the participants interviewed were positive about MCT, highlighting improvements in various aspects and emphasising factors that contributed to the changes achieved. Four main themes emerged from the analysis: Sowing the seeds of doubt; Significant changes in MCT attendees; Community formation; and What the MCT needs to improve.

Conclusions

The results provide an in-depth report on MCT from the users' perspective and allow reflection on new outcomes to be studied in the future, with quantitative and qualitative methods.

精神分裂症患者元认知训练(MCT)的定性报告
目的元认知训练是一种将认知行为治疗与心理教育相结合的心理干预手段。一些已发表的系统综述和荟萃分析提供了其有效性的有力证据。然而,患者对干预的意见或他们自己对所取得的变化的看法被忽视了。这项研究综合了在萨尔瓦多瓦尔帕莱索医院完成MCT的精神分裂症患者的第一人称报告。方法本研究采用定性方法。对完成MCT的患者进行半结构化访谈。访谈被可靠地记录下来,并进行了内容分析。结果所有受访者都对MCT持积极态度,强调了各方面的改进,并强调了促成变化的因素。分析中出现了四个主要主题:播下怀疑的种子;MCT参与者的显著变化;社区的形成;以及MCT需要改进的地方。结论本研究结果从使用者的角度对MCT进行了深入的报道,并通过定量和定性的方法对未来研究的新成果进行了反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信