Automatic reorientation algorithm for myocardial perfusion SPECT using segmentation

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ezequiel Vijande, Roxana Campisi, Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco, Roberto Agüero, Ricardo Geronazzo, Mauro Namías
{"title":"Automatic reorientation algorithm for myocardial perfusion SPECT using segmentation","authors":"Ezequiel Vijande,&nbsp;Roxana Campisi,&nbsp;Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco,&nbsp;Roberto Agüero,&nbsp;Ricardo Geronazzo,&nbsp;Mauro Namías","doi":"10.1111/eci.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cardiac reorientation is a necessary step in processing myocardial perfusion images. This task usually requires manual intervention and thus introduces intra- and inter-operator variability in the processing workflow that may lead to reduced reproducibility of the results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A deep learning model was trained to perform segmentation of cardiac structures from SPECT images simulated from a real PET/CT dataset. Labels used for training were automatically generated in a semi-supervised fashion by using TotalSegmentator on CT images. Segmentation results from the trained model were used to calculate cardiac landmarks from which the cardiac axes were defined, and reorientation was performed. Automatic reorientation was compared against the manual reorientation defined by three expert nuclear cardiologists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average rotation difference between cardiac axes calculated from predicted segmentations and ground-truth segmentations was <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mn>5.3</mn>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </msup>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <msup>\n <mn>3.1</mn>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> on the simulated SPECT test dataset. In real SPECT images, the standard deviation of the angle difference between the automatic method and human experts was lower in all axes and operators compared to the maximum inter-operator standard deviation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed deep learning-based algorithm provides an automatic method to perform cardiac reorientation in myocardial perfusion SPECT images with an error range like the variability between operators and with the advantage of using objective anatomical landmarks for the definition of cardiac axes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":"55 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.70016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiac reorientation is a necessary step in processing myocardial perfusion images. This task usually requires manual intervention and thus introduces intra- and inter-operator variability in the processing workflow that may lead to reduced reproducibility of the results.

Methods

A deep learning model was trained to perform segmentation of cardiac structures from SPECT images simulated from a real PET/CT dataset. Labels used for training were automatically generated in a semi-supervised fashion by using TotalSegmentator on CT images. Segmentation results from the trained model were used to calculate cardiac landmarks from which the cardiac axes were defined, and reorientation was performed. Automatic reorientation was compared against the manual reorientation defined by three expert nuclear cardiologists.

Results

The average rotation difference between cardiac axes calculated from predicted segmentations and ground-truth segmentations was 5.3 ° ± 3.1 ° on the simulated SPECT test dataset. In real SPECT images, the standard deviation of the angle difference between the automatic method and human experts was lower in all axes and operators compared to the maximum inter-operator standard deviation.

Conclusions

The proposed deep learning-based algorithm provides an automatic method to perform cardiac reorientation in myocardial perfusion SPECT images with an error range like the variability between operators and with the advantage of using objective anatomical landmarks for the definition of cardiac axes.

Abstract Image

基于分割的心肌灌注SPECT自动定向算法
心脏再定位是心肌灌注图像处理的必要步骤。这项任务通常需要人工干预,因此在处理工作流程中引入了操作员内部和操作员之间的可变性,这可能导致结果的可重复性降低。方法训练深度学习模型,从真实PET/CT数据集模拟的SPECT图像中进行心脏结构分割。使用TotalSegmentator对CT图像进行半监督自动生成训练用标签。将训练模型的分割结果用于计算心脏标志,并据此定义心脏轴,然后进行重新定位。将自动重新定位与三位核心脏病专家定义的手动重新定位进行比较。结果在模拟SPECT上,由预测分割得到的心轴与真地分割得到的心轴旋转差为5.3°±3.1°测试数据集。在真实的SPECT图像中,与最大算子间标准差相比,自动方法与人类专家的角度差在各轴和各算子上的标准差较小。结论基于深度学习的算法提供了一种在心肌灌注SPECT图像中进行心脏再定位的自动方法,其误差范围类似于算子之间的可变性,并且具有使用客观解剖标志来定义心脏轴的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信