Gerrit Frommeyer, Philipp S. Lange, Thomas Kleemann, Christoph Stellbrink, Hüseyin Ince, Johannes Brachmann, Thorsten Lewalter, Matthias Hochadel, Jochen Senges, Lars Eckardt
{"title":"Digitalis Therapy Is Associated With an Increased Risk of ICD Shock Delivery and Device Revision","authors":"Gerrit Frommeyer, Philipp S. Lange, Thomas Kleemann, Christoph Stellbrink, Hüseyin Ince, Johannes Brachmann, Thorsten Lewalter, Matthias Hochadel, Jochen Senges, Lars Eckardt","doi":"10.1111/anec.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Digitalis glycosides are employed for rate control of atrial fibrillation and treatment of heart failure. Previous studies suggested potential harmful effects of digitalis therapy. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence and potential impact of digitalis therapy on outcomes in patients with systolic failure who were implanted with an ICD- or CRT-ICD system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>The German Device Registry is a nationwide, prospective registry with a 1-year follow-up investigating 4384 patients receiving either ICD or CRT systems in 52 German centers. The present analysis focused on the presence of digitalis therapy in 3826 patients undergoing device implantation. Patients receiving digitalis therapy (<i>n</i> = 800) presented a more severely impaired left ventricular function, higher NYHA class, and an increased incidence of left bundle branch block. Consequently, the implantation of CRT systems was more common in this group. One-year mortality did not significantly differ between both groups (9.1% vs. 7.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.14). Similar results were obtained for the combined endpoint, including death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. ICD shock delivery (19.7% vs. 15.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and device revision (11.4% vs. 7.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.004) were more common in digitalis-treated patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this study in patients undergoing ICD or CRT implantation, an association of digitalis therapy with an increased risk of device revision was observed. Of note, mortality or severe cardiovascular events did not differ between both groups. Furthermore, an increased risk of ICD shock delivery was observed in digitalis-treated patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anec.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.70080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Digitalis glycosides are employed for rate control of atrial fibrillation and treatment of heart failure. Previous studies suggested potential harmful effects of digitalis therapy. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence and potential impact of digitalis therapy on outcomes in patients with systolic failure who were implanted with an ICD- or CRT-ICD system.
Methods and Results
The German Device Registry is a nationwide, prospective registry with a 1-year follow-up investigating 4384 patients receiving either ICD or CRT systems in 52 German centers. The present analysis focused on the presence of digitalis therapy in 3826 patients undergoing device implantation. Patients receiving digitalis therapy (n = 800) presented a more severely impaired left ventricular function, higher NYHA class, and an increased incidence of left bundle branch block. Consequently, the implantation of CRT systems was more common in this group. One-year mortality did not significantly differ between both groups (9.1% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.14). Similar results were obtained for the combined endpoint, including death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. ICD shock delivery (19.7% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.006) and device revision (11.4% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.004) were more common in digitalis-treated patients.
Conclusion
In this study in patients undergoing ICD or CRT implantation, an association of digitalis therapy with an increased risk of device revision was observed. Of note, mortality or severe cardiovascular events did not differ between both groups. Furthermore, an increased risk of ICD shock delivery was observed in digitalis-treated patients.
期刊介绍:
The ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (A.N.E) is an online only journal that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients.
ANE is the first journal in an evolving subspecialty that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. The publication includes topics related to 12-lead, exercise and high-resolution electrocardiography, arrhythmias, ischemia, repolarization phenomena, heart rate variability, circadian rhythms, bioengineering technology, signal-averaged ECGs, T-wave alternans and automatic external defibrillation.
ANE publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of noninvasive electrocardiology. Original research, clinical studies, state-of-the-art reviews, case reports, technical notes, and letters to the editors will be published to meet future demands in this field.