Physical modalities for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Xiangzhou Lan, Lingjia Li, Qing Jia, Fangyi He, Gaoyan Kuang, Weike Zeng, Miao Chen, Cheng Guo, Zhi Wen, Qing Chen
{"title":"Physical modalities for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis","authors":"Xiangzhou Lan,&nbsp;Lingjia Li,&nbsp;Qing Jia,&nbsp;Fangyi He,&nbsp;Gaoyan Kuang,&nbsp;Weike Zeng,&nbsp;Miao Chen,&nbsp;Cheng Guo,&nbsp;Zhi Wen,&nbsp;Qing Chen","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03015-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of various physical modalities in alleviating pain, stiffness, and functional impairment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In accordance with PRISMA-P guidelines, we systematically searched nine databases(CNKI, VIP Database, Wanfang Database, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) from inception to October 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating physical therapies for KOA. The interventions assessed included electrical stimulation therapy (EST), low-level light therapy (LLLT), thermotherapy (TT), cryotherapy (CT), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), with resistance and range of motion exercises (RRE) serving as comparators. Outcome measures comprised the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). Bayesian network meta-analyses and pairwise meta-analyses were performed using Stata 17.0 and R 4.4.1 software.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>32 RCTs involving 2,078 participants were included. LLLT demonstrated the highest efficacy for pain reduction (VAS: MD=–3.32, 95% CI:–3.82 to–0.75; WOMAC pain: MD=–3.74, 95% CI:–6.68 to–0.72) and joint function improvement (SUCRA = 79.8). ESWT ranked second for pain relief (VAS: MD=–1.31, 95% CI:–2.42 to–0.16) and mobility enhancement (6 MWT: SUCRA = 71.5), while TT showed superior efficacy in reducing stiffness (WOMAC stiffness: MD=–2.09, 95%CI:–3.06 to–0.94; SUCRA = 98.1). In contrast, ultrasonic therapy (UT) did not provide significant benefits.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings suggest that LLLT and ESWT may be optimal for pain relief and functional improvement in patients with KOA, whereas TT appears to be the most effective in reducing stiffness. Optimal dosing parameters of these physical modalities are crucial for maximizing clinical benefits. Clinicians should individualize treatment strategies based on patient-specific factors. Future large-scale RCTs are warranted to validate these protocols and address the heterogeneity of existing evidence.</p><h3>Clinical trial number</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03015-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03015-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of various physical modalities in alleviating pain, stiffness, and functional impairment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

In accordance with PRISMA-P guidelines, we systematically searched nine databases(CNKI, VIP Database, Wanfang Database, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) from inception to October 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating physical therapies for KOA. The interventions assessed included electrical stimulation therapy (EST), low-level light therapy (LLLT), thermotherapy (TT), cryotherapy (CT), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), with resistance and range of motion exercises (RRE) serving as comparators. Outcome measures comprised the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). Bayesian network meta-analyses and pairwise meta-analyses were performed using Stata 17.0 and R 4.4.1 software.

Results

32 RCTs involving 2,078 participants were included. LLLT demonstrated the highest efficacy for pain reduction (VAS: MD=–3.32, 95% CI:–3.82 to–0.75; WOMAC pain: MD=–3.74, 95% CI:–6.68 to–0.72) and joint function improvement (SUCRA = 79.8). ESWT ranked second for pain relief (VAS: MD=–1.31, 95% CI:–2.42 to–0.16) and mobility enhancement (6 MWT: SUCRA = 71.5), while TT showed superior efficacy in reducing stiffness (WOMAC stiffness: MD=–2.09, 95%CI:–3.06 to–0.94; SUCRA = 98.1). In contrast, ultrasonic therapy (UT) did not provide significant benefits.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that LLLT and ESWT may be optimal for pain relief and functional improvement in patients with KOA, whereas TT appears to be the most effective in reducing stiffness. Optimal dosing parameters of these physical modalities are crucial for maximizing clinical benefits. Clinicians should individualize treatment strategies based on patient-specific factors. Future large-scale RCTs are warranted to validate these protocols and address the heterogeneity of existing evidence.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

治疗膝骨关节炎的物理方式:网络荟萃分析
目的:本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在比较不同物理方式在缓解膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者疼痛、僵硬和功能损害方面的疗效。方法按照PRISMA-P指南,系统检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普数据库(VIP Database)、万方数据库(Wanfang Database)、中国医学信息网(sinmed)、PubMed、Embase、中国医学信息网(CINAHL)、Web of Science、Cochrane Library等9个数据库,检索自成立至2024年10月评估KOA物理治疗的随机对照试验(rct)。评估的干预措施包括电刺激疗法(EST)、低强度光疗法(LLLT)、热疗法(TT)、冷冻疗法(CT)和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT),并以阻力和活动范围练习(RRE)作为比较。结果测量包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和6分钟步行测试(6 MWT)。采用Stata 17.0和r4.4.1软件进行贝叶斯网络元分析和两两元分析。结果共纳入32项随机对照试验,共2078名受试者。LLLT表现出最高的疼痛减轻效果(VAS: MD= -3.32, 95% CI: -3.82至0.75;WOMAC疼痛:MD= -3.74, 95% CI: -6.68 - 0.72)和关节功能改善(SUCRA = 79.8)。ESWT在缓解疼痛(VAS: MD= -1.31, 95%CI: -2.42 - 0.16)和增强活动能力(6 MWT: SUCRA = 71.5)方面排名第二,而TT在降低僵硬度方面表现出优越的疗效(WOMAC僵硬度:MD= -2.09, 95%CI: -3.06 - 0.94;= 98.1)。相比之下,超声治疗(UT)没有提供显着的好处。结论:研究结果表明,对于KOA患者的疼痛缓解和功能改善,LLLT和ESWT可能是最佳的,而TT似乎在减轻僵硬方面最有效。这些物理模式的最佳给药参数对最大化临床效益至关重要。临床医生应根据患者的具体因素制定个性化的治疗策略。未来的大规模随机对照试验有必要验证这些方案,并解决现有证据的异质性。临床试验编号不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信