Bruno Martins Gurgatz, Camila Arielle Bufato Moreira, Luiza Natalino, Julia Stefany Chagas Albrecht, Marina Reback Garcia, Emerson Joucoski, Carlos Itsuo Yamamoto, César de Castro Martins, Rodrigo Arantes Reis, Ricardo Henrique Moreton Godoi
{"title":"Assessment and source apportionment of PM2.5 in a major Latin American port: elevated concentrations from traffic in the Great Atlantic Forest Reserve","authors":"Bruno Martins Gurgatz, Camila Arielle Bufato Moreira, Luiza Natalino, Julia Stefany Chagas Albrecht, Marina Reback Garcia, Emerson Joucoski, Carlos Itsuo Yamamoto, César de Castro Martins, Rodrigo Arantes Reis, Ricardo Henrique Moreton Godoi","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01677-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ports are pivotal to the global economy but contribute significantly to environmental impacts, notably air pollution from local sources. Long-term exposure to atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) poses severe health risks, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. This study investigates the source apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Paranaguá, a major Latin American port situated in a sensitive ecosystem and a marine protected area in the South Atlantic. In 2017, the mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration at Paranaguá port was 15.3 ± 7.5 µg m<sup>− 3</sup>, and 10% (<i>n</i> = 34) of the samples exceeding Brazil’s 24-hour environmental quality standard of (25 µg m<sup>− 3</sup>). This level of PM<sub>2.5</sub> correlates with an 8% increase in the risk of general mortality risk in the port region. Four diagnostic tools were employed to estimate PM<sub>2.5</sub> sources from soluble ions, trace and major metal compositions, and black carbon (BC) fraction: (1) Polar plots using meteorological data; (2) Correlation analysis with daily ship and truck counts; (3) Enrichment factors; and (4) Positive matrix factorization (PMF). The results indicate that traffic is the predominant source of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, primarily due to the extensive road transport of soy to the port. Given the anticipated continued dominance of road transport emissions, Brazil must implement measures to reduce traffic-related emissions. Aligning with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.9, we recommend adopting environmentally responsible production models, such as agroecology and local productive systems to mitigate PM<sub>2.5</sub>-related health risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 3","pages":"775 - 791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01677-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ports are pivotal to the global economy but contribute significantly to environmental impacts, notably air pollution from local sources. Long-term exposure to atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM2.5) poses severe health risks, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. This study investigates the source apportionment of PM2.5 Paranaguá, a major Latin American port situated in a sensitive ecosystem and a marine protected area in the South Atlantic. In 2017, the mean PM2.5 concentration at Paranaguá port was 15.3 ± 7.5 µg m− 3, and 10% (n = 34) of the samples exceeding Brazil’s 24-hour environmental quality standard of (25 µg m− 3). This level of PM2.5 correlates with an 8% increase in the risk of general mortality risk in the port region. Four diagnostic tools were employed to estimate PM2.5 sources from soluble ions, trace and major metal compositions, and black carbon (BC) fraction: (1) Polar plots using meteorological data; (2) Correlation analysis with daily ship and truck counts; (3) Enrichment factors; and (4) Positive matrix factorization (PMF). The results indicate that traffic is the predominant source of PM2.5, primarily due to the extensive road transport of soy to the port. Given the anticipated continued dominance of road transport emissions, Brazil must implement measures to reduce traffic-related emissions. Aligning with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.9, we recommend adopting environmentally responsible production models, such as agroecology and local productive systems to mitigate PM2.5-related health risk.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.