Zhenquan Zhang , Kai Ma , Leyao Li , Wenzhu Peng , Jinyang Zheng
{"title":"Study on the quenching strategies for seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel","authors":"Zhenquan Zhang , Kai Ma , Leyao Li , Wenzhu Peng , Jinyang Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel are commonly used for hydrogen refueling stations, whereas due to high-pressure storage requirements and the resulting large wall thickness, conventional single-sided quenched vessels usually face poor uniformity of mechanical properties along the wall thickness after heat treatment. In response to this issue, double-sided quenching has been proposed as an improved solution, while single-sided quenching remains a practical option for vessels with thin wall thicknesses due to its simplicity and low cost. To date, there is a lack of systematic research to clearly define the applicable thickness ranges for single-sided and double-sided quenching of such vessels. In this study, seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel with a wall thickness of 44 mm underwent single-sided quenching and double-sided quenching, respectively. Specimens sampled from the cylinder of these vessels along the wall thickness were subjected to hardness tests and Charpy impact tests. Concurrently, the variations in temperature and phase along the wall thickness were analyzed through numerical simulation. Based on this, quenching strategies were developed by simulating the mechanical uniformity of vessels with different wall thicknesses. Results indicate that when subjected to single-sided quenching, both hardness and impact absorbed energy gradually decrease from the outer surface to the inner surface, while double-sided quenching results in a distinct V-shaped distribution of these properties. This difference is primarily attributed to the significant variations in cooling rates and resulting phase distributions between single-sided and double-sided quenching. To meet the maximum permissible hardness deviations specified in GB/T 44457, single-sided quenching is suitable for vessels with wall thicknesses not exceeding 40 mm and double-sided quenching is recommended for vessels with wall thicknesses between 40 mm and 60 mm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":337,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 280-289"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925016180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel are commonly used for hydrogen refueling stations, whereas due to high-pressure storage requirements and the resulting large wall thickness, conventional single-sided quenched vessels usually face poor uniformity of mechanical properties along the wall thickness after heat treatment. In response to this issue, double-sided quenching has been proposed as an improved solution, while single-sided quenching remains a practical option for vessels with thin wall thicknesses due to its simplicity and low cost. To date, there is a lack of systematic research to clearly define the applicable thickness ranges for single-sided and double-sided quenching of such vessels. In this study, seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel with a wall thickness of 44 mm underwent single-sided quenching and double-sided quenching, respectively. Specimens sampled from the cylinder of these vessels along the wall thickness were subjected to hardness tests and Charpy impact tests. Concurrently, the variations in temperature and phase along the wall thickness were analyzed through numerical simulation. Based on this, quenching strategies were developed by simulating the mechanical uniformity of vessels with different wall thicknesses. Results indicate that when subjected to single-sided quenching, both hardness and impact absorbed energy gradually decrease from the outer surface to the inner surface, while double-sided quenching results in a distinct V-shaped distribution of these properties. This difference is primarily attributed to the significant variations in cooling rates and resulting phase distributions between single-sided and double-sided quenching. To meet the maximum permissible hardness deviations specified in GB/T 44457, single-sided quenching is suitable for vessels with wall thicknesses not exceeding 40 mm and double-sided quenching is recommended for vessels with wall thicknesses between 40 mm and 60 mm.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy is to facilitate the exchange of new ideas, technological advancements, and research findings in the field of Hydrogen Energy among scientists and engineers worldwide. This journal showcases original research, both analytical and experimental, covering various aspects of Hydrogen Energy. These include production, storage, transmission, utilization, enabling technologies, environmental impact, economic considerations, and global perspectives on hydrogen and its carriers such as NH3, CH4, alcohols, etc.
The utilization aspect encompasses various methods such as thermochemical (combustion), photochemical, electrochemical (fuel cells), and nuclear conversion of hydrogen, hydrogen isotopes, and hydrogen carriers into thermal, mechanical, and electrical energies. The applications of these energies can be found in transportation (including aerospace), industrial, commercial, and residential sectors.