E. Ligtermoet , N. Pauli , K. Martinus , C.E. Ramalho
{"title":"Stakeholder networks underpinning the transformative practice of urban roadside verge greening","authors":"E. Ligtermoet , N. Pauli , K. Martinus , C.E. Ramalho","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding how social networks facilitate the adoption of marginal urban greening actions can provide valuable impetus to guide transformative change in urban landscapes, which are under multiple social and environmental stressors globally. Social network mapping of resource flows, particularly information sharing, is one tool for understanding the emergent and transformative urban greening practice of landscaping roadside verges with native and/or waterwise plants. Urban roadside greening in Perth, Western Australia, while formerly prohibited, is now increasingly accepted and advocated for by multiple sectors, as a nature-based solution that provides multiple ecosystem services and social-ecological benefits. This study drew on participatory stakeholder mapping to examine the stakeholder network of non-residential actors connected with verge greening. Using social network analysis, we found almost 80% of resource flows across a large network of diverse stakeholders were information related. We identified top providers, recipients, brokers, as local and state governments and peak bodies, and, to a lesser extent, key individuals, community groups, nurseries, residents and environmental consultants and developers. The network was characterized by four dominant and five smaller communities, which we classified into a typology based on composition, structure (quantitative material), and contextual knowledge, including function, dominant roles and responsibilities (qualitative material). These were the ‘planning and development hub’, ‘governance enablers’, ‘water efficient hub’, ‘greenspace hub’. The five smaller communities were ‘advocates’, ‘transformers’, ‘new vision’, ‘local networks’ and ‘early adopters’. The network analysis provides evidence of communities that transcend traditional sector or actor silos, commonly converging around local governments as key knowledge brokers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 105342"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625000490","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding how social networks facilitate the adoption of marginal urban greening actions can provide valuable impetus to guide transformative change in urban landscapes, which are under multiple social and environmental stressors globally. Social network mapping of resource flows, particularly information sharing, is one tool for understanding the emergent and transformative urban greening practice of landscaping roadside verges with native and/or waterwise plants. Urban roadside greening in Perth, Western Australia, while formerly prohibited, is now increasingly accepted and advocated for by multiple sectors, as a nature-based solution that provides multiple ecosystem services and social-ecological benefits. This study drew on participatory stakeholder mapping to examine the stakeholder network of non-residential actors connected with verge greening. Using social network analysis, we found almost 80% of resource flows across a large network of diverse stakeholders were information related. We identified top providers, recipients, brokers, as local and state governments and peak bodies, and, to a lesser extent, key individuals, community groups, nurseries, residents and environmental consultants and developers. The network was characterized by four dominant and five smaller communities, which we classified into a typology based on composition, structure (quantitative material), and contextual knowledge, including function, dominant roles and responsibilities (qualitative material). These were the ‘planning and development hub’, ‘governance enablers’, ‘water efficient hub’, ‘greenspace hub’. The five smaller communities were ‘advocates’, ‘transformers’, ‘new vision’, ‘local networks’ and ‘early adopters’. The network analysis provides evidence of communities that transcend traditional sector or actor silos, commonly converging around local governments as key knowledge brokers.
期刊介绍:
Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.