Francesco Bruzzone, Federico Cavallaro, Silvio Nocera
{"title":"Accessibility potential of long-distance Mobility-as-a-Service","authors":"Francesco Bruzzone, Federico Cavallaro, Silvio Nocera","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) integrates multiple transportation modes into a unified, on-demand mobility service tailored to customer preferences and needs. While increasingly explored for short distances and urban settings, there is still a limited academic debate about its applicability for long-distance travels. This contribution examines the potential of long-distance MaaS for long-distance trips and systematic travellers, by assessing its accessibility potential and comparing it to the solo driving option. First, the scheme and possible business models of long-distance MaaS are proposed, expanding on available literature through an extensive review. Then, a method to calculate the potential of long-distance MaaS is proposed, by calculating its accessibility via an adapted version of the travel-cost approach. The convenience is evaluated under different policy scenarios, such as toll reductions for shared vehicles, dedicated infrastructure and incentives in a case study located in Northern Italy. The results offer quantitative insights into the likelihood of long-distance MaaS of being a reliable alternative to both private vehicles and conventional public transport, thus enhancing the accessibility of a destination by means of MaaS-supported multimodal solutions. In particular, the improvement of the multimodal transfer experience and the reduction of out-of-vehicle travel times are found to guarantee better accessibility by long-distance MaaS, compared to driving, for up to 95% of trips. A discussion about the possible modal choice implications and the interplay between stakeholders ends the contribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104466"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000941","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) integrates multiple transportation modes into a unified, on-demand mobility service tailored to customer preferences and needs. While increasingly explored for short distances and urban settings, there is still a limited academic debate about its applicability for long-distance travels. This contribution examines the potential of long-distance MaaS for long-distance trips and systematic travellers, by assessing its accessibility potential and comparing it to the solo driving option. First, the scheme and possible business models of long-distance MaaS are proposed, expanding on available literature through an extensive review. Then, a method to calculate the potential of long-distance MaaS is proposed, by calculating its accessibility via an adapted version of the travel-cost approach. The convenience is evaluated under different policy scenarios, such as toll reductions for shared vehicles, dedicated infrastructure and incentives in a case study located in Northern Italy. The results offer quantitative insights into the likelihood of long-distance MaaS of being a reliable alternative to both private vehicles and conventional public transport, thus enhancing the accessibility of a destination by means of MaaS-supported multimodal solutions. In particular, the improvement of the multimodal transfer experience and the reduction of out-of-vehicle travel times are found to guarantee better accessibility by long-distance MaaS, compared to driving, for up to 95% of trips. A discussion about the possible modal choice implications and the interplay between stakeholders ends the contribution.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.