Exploring creativity and innovation in organizational contexts: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of key models and emerging opportunities

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Rodrigo de Barros, Luis Mauricio Resende, Joseane Pontes
{"title":"Exploring creativity and innovation in organizational contexts: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of key models and emerging opportunities","authors":"Rodrigo de Barros,&nbsp;Luis Mauricio Resende,&nbsp;Joseane Pontes","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the critical question of how to develop creativity for innovation within organizational contexts, identifying significant gaps in the existing literature. Through a rigorous systematic review and bibliometric analysis, the study examines the intersection of creativity and innovation, addressing three key questions: (1) What are the key models of creativity and innovation discussed in the literature, and how are they applied in organizational contexts? (2) How has recent literature on creativity and innovation evolved to support organizational practice and the development of new frameworks? (3) What gaps and opportunities have been identified in studies on creativity and innovation within organizational contexts, and how can these be addressed in future research? The systematic review resulted in the identification of 462 articles, of which 25 were selected as state-of-the-art based on their relevance and impact. These articles, along with their references, form the core of the bibliometric analysis, which maps the key models, trends, and knowledge gaps in the field. The study concludes that while there are solid theoretical models for understanding creativity and innovation, there is a substantial gap in the practical application of these models, particularly concerning microprocesses—small-scale interactions and behaviours within organizations that are essential for creative development. These microprocesses include specific forms of collaboration, information exchange, and problem-solving within creative teams, which are crucial for fostering creativity in organizational environments. In addition to mapping these gaps, the paper identifies significant opportunities for advancing research, suggesting that future studies focus on how to operationalize and develop these microprocesses to promote innovation more effectively. By highlighting these gaps and opportunities, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how creativity can be cultivated and applied in organizational contexts, offering clear directions for future research aimed at translating theory into practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 2","pages":"Article 100526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125000617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the critical question of how to develop creativity for innovation within organizational contexts, identifying significant gaps in the existing literature. Through a rigorous systematic review and bibliometric analysis, the study examines the intersection of creativity and innovation, addressing three key questions: (1) What are the key models of creativity and innovation discussed in the literature, and how are they applied in organizational contexts? (2) How has recent literature on creativity and innovation evolved to support organizational practice and the development of new frameworks? (3) What gaps and opportunities have been identified in studies on creativity and innovation within organizational contexts, and how can these be addressed in future research? The systematic review resulted in the identification of 462 articles, of which 25 were selected as state-of-the-art based on their relevance and impact. These articles, along with their references, form the core of the bibliometric analysis, which maps the key models, trends, and knowledge gaps in the field. The study concludes that while there are solid theoretical models for understanding creativity and innovation, there is a substantial gap in the practical application of these models, particularly concerning microprocesses—small-scale interactions and behaviours within organizations that are essential for creative development. These microprocesses include specific forms of collaboration, information exchange, and problem-solving within creative teams, which are crucial for fostering creativity in organizational environments. In addition to mapping these gaps, the paper identifies significant opportunities for advancing research, suggesting that future studies focus on how to operationalize and develop these microprocesses to promote innovation more effectively. By highlighting these gaps and opportunities, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how creativity can be cultivated and applied in organizational contexts, offering clear directions for future research aimed at translating theory into practice.
探索组织环境中的创造力和创新:关键模型和新兴机会的系统回顾和文献计量学分析
本文探讨了如何在组织环境中发展创新创造力的关键问题,确定了现有文献中的重大空白。通过严格的系统回顾和文献计量分析,本研究考察了创造力和创新的交叉点,解决了三个关键问题:(1)文献中讨论的创造力和创新的关键模型是什么,以及它们如何在组织环境中应用?(2)最近关于创造力和创新的文献是如何演变为支持组织实践和新框架的发展的?(3)在组织背景下的创造力和创新研究中发现了哪些差距和机会,如何在未来的研究中解决这些问题?系统评价结果确定了462篇文章,其中25篇根据其相关性和影响力被选为最先进的。这些文章以及它们的参考文献构成了文献计量学分析的核心,它绘制了该领域的关键模型、趋势和知识差距。研究得出的结论是,虽然有坚实的理论模型来理解创造力和创新,但在这些模型的实际应用中存在很大的差距,特别是在微过程方面,即组织内部对创造性发展至关重要的小规模互动和行为。这些微过程包括创造性团队中特定形式的协作、信息交换和问题解决,这对于在组织环境中培养创造力至关重要。除了绘制这些差距之外,本文还确定了推进研究的重要机会,建议未来的研究重点是如何操作和开发这些微过程,以更有效地促进创新。通过强调这些差距和机会,该研究有助于更深入地了解如何在组织环境中培养和应用创造力,为旨在将理论转化为实践的未来研究提供明确的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信