Hypervelocity impact on Whipple shields with varying bumper material at 3 and 7 km/s: An experimental study

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Rannveig M. Færgestad , Bruce A. Davis , Christopher J. Cline II , Eric L. Christiansen , Kevin A. Ford , Odd S. Hopperstad , Jens K. Holmen , Tore Børvik
{"title":"Hypervelocity impact on Whipple shields with varying bumper material at 3 and 7 km/s: An experimental study","authors":"Rannveig M. Færgestad ,&nbsp;Bruce A. Davis ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Cline II ,&nbsp;Eric L. Christiansen ,&nbsp;Kevin A. Ford ,&nbsp;Odd S. Hopperstad ,&nbsp;Jens K. Holmen ,&nbsp;Tore Børvik","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The behavior of various bumper materials subjected to hypervelocity impact is of high interest, as different materials show varying ability to shock and break up an incoming projectile, and can produce varying amounts of ejecta on impact. In this study, an experimental campaign of 10 normal impacts of spherical Al 2017-T4 projectiles on Whipple shields at 3 and 7 km/s is presented, with various bumper configurations of near equal areal density. Five different bumper configurations are studied (aluminum wire mesh, steel wire mesh, Nextel woven fabric, open-cell aluminum foam with a face sheet, and Beta cloth with an aluminum plate) and compared to a traditional thin Al 6061-T6 bumper. The results are evaluated based on high-speed video footage of the debris cloud development over the standoff distance, as well as observed damage on the ejecta catcher, bumper, rear wall, and witness plate, and 3D scans of the rear walls and witness plates. The results are found to be significantly different between the different bumper configurations. At 3 km/s, the bumper configuration with open-cell aluminum foam with a face sheet performed best, while at 7 km/s, the baseline Al 6061-T6 bumper and the bumper with Beta cloth showed the best performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 105328"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25001095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The behavior of various bumper materials subjected to hypervelocity impact is of high interest, as different materials show varying ability to shock and break up an incoming projectile, and can produce varying amounts of ejecta on impact. In this study, an experimental campaign of 10 normal impacts of spherical Al 2017-T4 projectiles on Whipple shields at 3 and 7 km/s is presented, with various bumper configurations of near equal areal density. Five different bumper configurations are studied (aluminum wire mesh, steel wire mesh, Nextel woven fabric, open-cell aluminum foam with a face sheet, and Beta cloth with an aluminum plate) and compared to a traditional thin Al 6061-T6 bumper. The results are evaluated based on high-speed video footage of the debris cloud development over the standoff distance, as well as observed damage on the ejecta catcher, bumper, rear wall, and witness plate, and 3D scans of the rear walls and witness plates. The results are found to be significantly different between the different bumper configurations. At 3 km/s, the bumper configuration with open-cell aluminum foam with a face sheet performed best, while at 7 km/s, the baseline Al 6061-T6 bumper and the bumper with Beta cloth showed the best performance.
3和7km /s下不同保险杠材料对惠普尔护盾的超高速撞击:实验研究
不同的保险杠材料在超高速撞击下的表现引起了人们的高度关注,因为不同的材料表现出不同的冲击和破碎来袭弹丸的能力,并且在撞击时产生不同数量的弹射物。在本研究中,采用近等面密度的不同缓冲器配置,以3和7 km/s的速度进行了10次球形Al - 2017-T4弹丸对惠普尔护盾的正常撞击实验。研究了五种不同的保险杠配置(铝丝网、钢丝网、Nextel编织织物、带面板的开孔泡沫铝和带铝板的Beta布),并与传统的薄铝6061-T6保险杠进行了比较。评估结果的依据是在离地距离上拍摄的碎片云发展的高速视频片段,以及观察到的弹射捕集器、保险杠、后壁和见证板上的损伤,以及后壁和见证板的3D扫描。结果发现,在不同的保险杠配置之间存在显著差异。在3 km/s速度下,使用开孔泡沫铝板的保险杠性能最好,而在7 km/s速度下,基线Al 6061-T6保险杠和使用Beta布的保险杠性能最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信