Automation and high throughput sample analysis with various platforms in microextraction techniques: A need for ecofriendly, green, and cost-effective sample preparation approaches – A review

IF 11.8 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Wajid Ali Khan , S. Amir Hossein Fallah , Saeid Moltajihagh , Fatemeh Hamdi , Fatemeh Alipour , Afsaneh Mollahosseini , Grzegorz Boczkaj
{"title":"Automation and high throughput sample analysis with various platforms in microextraction techniques: A need for ecofriendly, green, and cost-effective sample preparation approaches – A review","authors":"Wajid Ali Khan ,&nbsp;S. Amir Hossein Fallah ,&nbsp;Saeid Moltajihagh ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Hamdi ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Alipour ,&nbsp;Afsaneh Mollahosseini ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Boczkaj","doi":"10.1016/j.trac.2025.118247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Popularization of green analytical chemistry (GAC) encouraged miniaturization of sample preparation scale – with preference to microextraction scale methods and automation by platforms to achieve high throughput, reduce energy costs, minimize hazardous chemical disposal, and shorten extraction time. It improves the sample throughput, extraction efficiency, sensitivity, reproducibility, and greenness of the developed method. To achieve these objectives, automatic platforms for high-throughput liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) and solid-phase extraction/microextraction (SPE/SPME) were developed. Among the reported platforms, the 96-well plate, pipette tip, lab-in-syringe (LIS), and microfluidic devices receive significant attention. This review describes the advantages of each platform with respect to green chemistry principles. In addition, the challenges associated with each platform are critically evaluated. Moreover, the review highlights how the use of these platforms can minimize waste disposal, energy consumption, and reduce the hazardous effects. Furthermore, a comparative assessment of the above mentioned platforms in terms of green microextraction techniques has been discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":439,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Analytical Chemistry","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 118247"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165993625001153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Popularization of green analytical chemistry (GAC) encouraged miniaturization of sample preparation scale – with preference to microextraction scale methods and automation by platforms to achieve high throughput, reduce energy costs, minimize hazardous chemical disposal, and shorten extraction time. It improves the sample throughput, extraction efficiency, sensitivity, reproducibility, and greenness of the developed method. To achieve these objectives, automatic platforms for high-throughput liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) and solid-phase extraction/microextraction (SPE/SPME) were developed. Among the reported platforms, the 96-well plate, pipette tip, lab-in-syringe (LIS), and microfluidic devices receive significant attention. This review describes the advantages of each platform with respect to green chemistry principles. In addition, the challenges associated with each platform are critically evaluated. Moreover, the review highlights how the use of these platforms can minimize waste disposal, energy consumption, and reduce the hazardous effects. Furthermore, a comparative assessment of the above mentioned platforms in terms of green microextraction techniques has been discussed.

Abstract Image

微萃取技术中各种平台的自动化和高通量样品分析:对环保,绿色和具有成本效益的样品制备方法的需求-综述
绿色分析化学(GAC)的普及鼓励了样品制备规模的小型化-优先采用微萃取规模方法和平台自动化,以实现高通量,降低能源成本,最大限度地减少危险化学品的处置,缩短萃取时间。该方法提高了样品通量、提取效率、灵敏度、重现性和绿色度。为了实现这些目标,开发了高通量液相微萃取(LPME)和固相萃取/微萃取(SPE/SPME)自动平台。在报道的平台中,96孔板、移液器尖端、注射器实验室(LIS)和微流体装置受到了极大的关注。这篇综述描述了每个平台在绿色化学原理方面的优势。此外,还对与每个平台相关的挑战进行了严格评估。此外,该审查还强调了这些平台的使用如何最大限度地减少废物处理、能源消耗和减少有害影响。此外,从绿色微萃取技术的角度对上述平台进行了比较评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
4.60%
发文量
257
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: TrAC publishes succinct and critical overviews of recent advancements in analytical chemistry, designed to assist analytical chemists and other users of analytical techniques. These reviews offer excellent, up-to-date, and timely coverage of various topics within analytical chemistry. Encompassing areas such as analytical instrumentation, biomedical analysis, biomolecular analysis, biosensors, chemical analysis, chemometrics, clinical chemistry, drug discovery, environmental analysis and monitoring, food analysis, forensic science, laboratory automation, materials science, metabolomics, pesticide-residue analysis, pharmaceutical analysis, proteomics, surface science, and water analysis and monitoring, these critical reviews provide comprehensive insights for practitioners in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信