Managing light and nutrients to restore plant diversity in temperate woodlands

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jan Häusler, Jan Douda, Karel Boublík, Jana Doudová
{"title":"Managing light and nutrients to restore plant diversity in temperate woodlands","authors":"Jan Häusler,&nbsp;Jan Douda,&nbsp;Karel Boublík,&nbsp;Jana Doudová","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restoration efforts increasingly focus on light-enhancing treatments to create open forests with high biodiversity. However, climate change and forest eutrophication, driven by atmospheric nutrient deposition and shifts towards tree species with high-quality litter, pose risks such as vegetation ruderalisation and suppression of nutrient-sensitive oligotrophic species. This study presents the first experiment combining canopy opening with litter removal, a strategy potentially reducing nutrient loads, in a species-rich oak-hornbeam forest in Central Europe (Czech Republic). We established a split-plot experiment with two partially thinned plots (30 % canopy openness), comprising 8 paired subplots: one with litter removal and the other as a control. Paired plots were also established in an adjacent closed-canopy forest. Regardless of litter removal, vascular plant richness increased significantly in open-canopy plots by the second year, with the highest richness observed in open-canopy plots with litter removal from the third year onwards. RLQ analysis combining compositional data with species traits revealed a clear effect of canopy opening, while also showing that litter removal in thinned plots favoured oligo- and mesotrophic species typical of open habitats, such as thermophilous oak woodlands and dry grasslands. In contrast, nutrient-demanding species characterized by greater plant height were favoured in thinned plots where litter was retained. Litter removal had no significant effect in the closed-canopy forest, suggesting its effectiveness depends on sufficient light availability. Our findings show that combining canopy opening with litter removal can prevent vegetation ruderalisation and support the establishment of target understorey species of open woodlands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"306 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725001673","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restoration efforts increasingly focus on light-enhancing treatments to create open forests with high biodiversity. However, climate change and forest eutrophication, driven by atmospheric nutrient deposition and shifts towards tree species with high-quality litter, pose risks such as vegetation ruderalisation and suppression of nutrient-sensitive oligotrophic species. This study presents the first experiment combining canopy opening with litter removal, a strategy potentially reducing nutrient loads, in a species-rich oak-hornbeam forest in Central Europe (Czech Republic). We established a split-plot experiment with two partially thinned plots (30 % canopy openness), comprising 8 paired subplots: one with litter removal and the other as a control. Paired plots were also established in an adjacent closed-canopy forest. Regardless of litter removal, vascular plant richness increased significantly in open-canopy plots by the second year, with the highest richness observed in open-canopy plots with litter removal from the third year onwards. RLQ analysis combining compositional data with species traits revealed a clear effect of canopy opening, while also showing that litter removal in thinned plots favoured oligo- and mesotrophic species typical of open habitats, such as thermophilous oak woodlands and dry grasslands. In contrast, nutrient-demanding species characterized by greater plant height were favoured in thinned plots where litter was retained. Litter removal had no significant effect in the closed-canopy forest, suggesting its effectiveness depends on sufficient light availability. Our findings show that combining canopy opening with litter removal can prevent vegetation ruderalisation and support the establishment of target understorey species of open woodlands.
管理光照和养分以恢复温带林地的植物多样性
恢复工作越来越侧重于光增强处理,以创造具有高生物多样性的开放森林。然而,气候变化和森林富营养化是由大气养分沉积和向具有高质量凋落物的树种转移所驱动的,这带来了诸如植被糙化和对营养敏感的少营养物种受到抑制等风险。本研究首次在中欧(捷克共和国)一个物种丰富的橡树角梁森林中进行了将树冠打开与凋落物清除相结合的实验,这是一种可能减少养分负荷的策略。我们在两个部分稀疏的样地(30%树冠开度)上建立了分样试验,包括8个成对的子样地:一个进行凋落物清除,另一个作为对照。在相邻的封闭冠层森林中也建立了成对样地。无论凋落物清除与否,开放冠层样地维管植物丰富度在第二年显著增加,从第三年开始,开放冠层样地的维管植物丰富度最高。RLQ分析表明,林冠开度对凋落物有明显的影响,同时林冠开度对开放生境中典型的少营养型和中营养型物种有利,如喜热栎林和干草地。相反,在保留凋落物的稀疏样地,株高较高的养分需要型物种更受青睐。凋落物清除对封闭林冠的影响不显著,表明其有效性取决于充足的光照供应。研究结果表明,开放林冠与清除凋落物相结合可以防止植被糙化,并支持开放林地目标林下物种的建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信