Canadian Occupational Performance Measure the state of the art - a review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Anette Enemark Larsen, Mary Law
{"title":"Canadian Occupational Performance Measure the state of the art - a review.","authors":"Anette Enemark Larsen, Mary Law","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2025.2473045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational therapists aim to deliver interventions to enhance clients' occupational performance and document the outcomes of clients' experience. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a measurement tool designed for such documentation, and a recognised measurement used worldwide. However, the authors' research and teaching experiences have revealed that there are often misinterpretations and uncertainties administering the COPM. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to present information to answer these issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a state-of-the-art review, 856 papers were identified on PubMed, of which 36 were included together with the first author's work, to summarise relevant answers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Answers to the four key issues are unfolded to address the misinterpretations and uncertainties regarding: (1) the core content of the COPM, focussing on being client-centred; (2) understanding the term occupational performance; (3) reflecting on the psycho-metric status on the COPM, what it provides; (4) reflecting on necessary considerations when administering the measurement, understanding the measurement's five steps to ensure a valid and reliable use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The valid, reliable, and applicable use of the COPM can be enhanced through therapists' commitments to and understanding of these four issues. Based on this, guidelines on how to best administer the COPM are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"32 1","pages":"2473045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2025.2473045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occupational therapists aim to deliver interventions to enhance clients' occupational performance and document the outcomes of clients' experience. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a measurement tool designed for such documentation, and a recognised measurement used worldwide. However, the authors' research and teaching experiences have revealed that there are often misinterpretations and uncertainties administering the COPM. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to present information to answer these issues.

Methods: Based on a state-of-the-art review, 856 papers were identified on PubMed, of which 36 were included together with the first author's work, to summarise relevant answers.

Results: Answers to the four key issues are unfolded to address the misinterpretations and uncertainties regarding: (1) the core content of the COPM, focussing on being client-centred; (2) understanding the term occupational performance; (3) reflecting on the psycho-metric status on the COPM, what it provides; (4) reflecting on necessary considerations when administering the measurement, understanding the measurement's five steps to ensure a valid and reliable use.

Conclusion: The valid, reliable, and applicable use of the COPM can be enhanced through therapists' commitments to and understanding of these four issues. Based on this, guidelines on how to best administer the COPM are provided.

加拿大职业表现衡量的艺术状态-回顾。
背景:职业治疗师的目标是提供干预措施,以提高客户的职业表现,并记录客户体验的结果。加拿大职业绩效测量(COPM)是为此类文件设计的测量工具,也是全球公认的测量方法。然而,作者的研究和教学经验表明,COPM管理中经常存在误解和不确定性。因此,本文的目的是提供信息来回答这些问题。方法:基于最先进的综述,在PubMed上识别856篇论文,其中36篇与第一作者的作品一起收录,总结相关答案。结果:对四个关键问题展开了回答,以解决以下方面的误解和不确定性:(1)COPM的核心内容,侧重于以客户为中心;(2)对职业绩效一词的理解;(3)反思心理测量学在COPM中的地位,它提供了什么;(4)在管理测量时反思必要的考虑,了解测量的五个步骤,以确保有效和可靠的使用。结论:通过治疗师对这四个问题的承诺和理解,可以提高COPM使用的有效性、可靠性和适用性。在此基础上,提供了如何最好地管理COPM的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信