Tidal Model in light of complexity: contributions to clinical nursing care in mental health.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0377en
Natália Rocha Chagas Comaru, Ana Ruth Macêdo Monteiro, Lucia de Fatima da Silva, Maria Célia de Freitas, Maria Vilani Cavalcante Guedes
{"title":"Tidal Model in light of complexity: contributions to clinical nursing care in mental health.","authors":"Natália Rocha Chagas Comaru, Ana Ruth Macêdo Monteiro, Lucia de Fatima da Silva, Maria Célia de Freitas, Maria Vilani Cavalcante Guedes","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0377en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a theoretical essay that aims to reflect on the articulations between Phil Barker's Tidals Model and Edgar Morin's Complexity Theory, highlighting Tidals Model adequacy for clinical nursing care in mental health according to the psychosocial care model guidelines. The key concepts of Complexity Theory (dialogic, organizational recursion, hologram and tetragram) were used in an articulated manner with Tidals Model, identifying that this framework is aligned with the following guidelines of psychosocial care: respect for human rights, humanized care, promotion of equity, diversification of care strategies, combating stigmas and prejudices, guaranteeing access to services, and offering comprehensive care and multidisciplinary assistance, under an interdisciplinary logic. Tidals Model represents an alternative to traditional care models, with a care proposal aligned with current public health policies. It is suggested that nurses adopt this framework more effectively, expanding its application to the most diverse audiences and contexts of mental healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"59 ","pages":"e20240377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0377en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a theoretical essay that aims to reflect on the articulations between Phil Barker's Tidals Model and Edgar Morin's Complexity Theory, highlighting Tidals Model adequacy for clinical nursing care in mental health according to the psychosocial care model guidelines. The key concepts of Complexity Theory (dialogic, organizational recursion, hologram and tetragram) were used in an articulated manner with Tidals Model, identifying that this framework is aligned with the following guidelines of psychosocial care: respect for human rights, humanized care, promotion of equity, diversification of care strategies, combating stigmas and prejudices, guaranteeing access to services, and offering comprehensive care and multidisciplinary assistance, under an interdisciplinary logic. Tidals Model represents an alternative to traditional care models, with a care proposal aligned with current public health policies. It is suggested that nurses adopt this framework more effectively, expanding its application to the most diverse audiences and contexts of mental healthcare.

复杂性下的潮汐模型:对心理健康临床护理的贡献。
这是一篇理论论文,旨在反映菲尔巴克的潮汐模型和埃德加莫林的复杂性理论之间的表达,突出潮汐模型在心理健康临床护理的充足性根据社会心理护理模型的指导方针。复杂性理论的关键概念(对话、组织递归、全息图和四边形)在潮汐模型中以明确的方式使用,确定该框架与以下社会心理护理指导方针一致:尊重人权,人性化护理,促进公平,护理战略多样化,打击污名和偏见,保证获得服务,并在跨学科逻辑下提供全面护理和多学科援助。潮汐模式是传统护理模式的另一种选择,其护理建议与当前的公共卫生政策保持一致。建议护士更有效地采用这一框架,将其应用范围扩大到最多样化的受众和精神卫生保健背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信