{"title":"Validating the effects of sex differences and auditory/visual-based verbal memory on recall tasks in a virtual supermarket.","authors":"Chen-Wei Chang","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2484787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Virtual reality (VR), with its superior ecological validity, offers a potential new method for assessing and training memory recall. To further validate the utilization of VR, the current study explores the effects of sex and auditory/visual-based verbal memory-both closely related to memory recall in everyday shopping behavior-on recall tasks both inside and outside of a virtual supermarket. The International Shopping List Test (ISLT) verbal recall tasks were used in the experiment. To examine whether the same effects exist in VR, a self-developed virtual supermarket was applied. The results indicate that women and those who were in the visual-based group for verbal memory performed better both inside and outside the VR. The study further compares users' spatial-based visual memory encoding with verbal memory retrieval in VR to determine whether they align with theoretical assumptions and prior studies. The findings support the view that women's superior visual memory may be compromised in the virtual supermarket due to their relatively lower self-reported sense of direction (SOD) and higher levels of wayfinding anxiety compared to men. Empirical and practical implications based on these findings are discussed in the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2484787","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR), with its superior ecological validity, offers a potential new method for assessing and training memory recall. To further validate the utilization of VR, the current study explores the effects of sex and auditory/visual-based verbal memory-both closely related to memory recall in everyday shopping behavior-on recall tasks both inside and outside of a virtual supermarket. The International Shopping List Test (ISLT) verbal recall tasks were used in the experiment. To examine whether the same effects exist in VR, a self-developed virtual supermarket was applied. The results indicate that women and those who were in the visual-based group for verbal memory performed better both inside and outside the VR. The study further compares users' spatial-based visual memory encoding with verbal memory retrieval in VR to determine whether they align with theoretical assumptions and prior studies. The findings support the view that women's superior visual memory may be compromised in the virtual supermarket due to their relatively lower self-reported sense of direction (SOD) and higher levels of wayfinding anxiety compared to men. Empirical and practical implications based on these findings are discussed in the study.
虚拟现实技术以其优越的生态效度,为记忆回忆的评估和训练提供了一种潜在的新方法。为了进一步验证虚拟现实的应用,目前的研究探讨了性别和基于听觉/视觉的言语记忆对虚拟超市内外回忆任务的影响,这两种记忆都与日常购物行为中的记忆回忆密切相关。实验采用国际购物清单测验(International Shopping List Test, ISLT)的言语回忆任务。为了检验VR中是否存在同样的效果,我们使用了一个自主开发的虚拟超市。结果表明,女性和那些以视觉为基础的语言记忆组在虚拟现实内外的表现都更好。该研究进一步比较了虚拟现实中用户基于空间的视觉记忆编码与言语记忆检索,以确定它们是否符合理论假设和先前的研究。研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即女性优越的视觉记忆可能在虚拟超市中受到损害,因为与男性相比,她们自我报告的方向感(SOD)相对较低,寻路焦虑水平较高。基于这些发现,本研究讨论了实证和实践意义。
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.