Healing Rate and Time to Closure of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Real-World Service Evaluation of Neuromuscular Electrostimulation as an Adjunct to Compression Therapy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Holly Murray, Rochelle Duong, Duncan Shirreffs Bain
{"title":"Healing Rate and Time to Closure of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Real-World Service Evaluation of Neuromuscular Electrostimulation as an Adjunct to Compression Therapy.","authors":"Holly Murray, Rochelle Duong, Duncan Shirreffs Bain","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a service evaluation of neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) as an adjunct to compression therapy, comparing the rate of wound margin advance and time to closure with a matched retrospective control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients with venous leg ulcers were prescribed NMES for 6 hours per day for 56 days or until wound closure (whichever occurred first), in addition to multilayer compression. Wounds were selected for size, with an inclusion criterion of a maximum of 12 cm2. Wound progress was compared with 15 retrospective control patients who were matched for ulcer size and duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The retrospective group had a healing rate of 0.31 mm per week (95% CI, 29-37 mm/week), whereas the prospective compression plus NMES group had a healing rate of 0.56 mm per week (95% CI, 50-62 mm/week; P = .004). All wounds in both groups healed completely during the service evaluation. Mean time to closure for the retrospective group was 77 days (95% CI, 66-88 days), whereas the NMES group had a mean time to closure of 40 days (95% CI, 37-43 days; P = .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding NMES of the common peroneal nerve to a care bundle including multicomponent compression resulted in significantly faster wound margin advance and significantly less time to heal in comparison with retrospective matched controls. Future randomized controlled trials or self-controlled studies of this approach would be of great interest to inform clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To perform a service evaluation of neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) as an adjunct to compression therapy, comparing the rate of wound margin advance and time to closure with a matched retrospective control group.

Methods: Fifteen patients with venous leg ulcers were prescribed NMES for 6 hours per day for 56 days or until wound closure (whichever occurred first), in addition to multilayer compression. Wounds were selected for size, with an inclusion criterion of a maximum of 12 cm2. Wound progress was compared with 15 retrospective control patients who were matched for ulcer size and duration.

Results: The retrospective group had a healing rate of 0.31 mm per week (95% CI, 29-37 mm/week), whereas the prospective compression plus NMES group had a healing rate of 0.56 mm per week (95% CI, 50-62 mm/week; P = .004). All wounds in both groups healed completely during the service evaluation. Mean time to closure for the retrospective group was 77 days (95% CI, 66-88 days), whereas the NMES group had a mean time to closure of 40 days (95% CI, 37-43 days; P = .005).

Conclusions: Adding NMES of the common peroneal nerve to a care bundle including multicomponent compression resulted in significantly faster wound margin advance and significantly less time to heal in comparison with retrospective matched controls. Future randomized controlled trials or self-controlled studies of this approach would be of great interest to inform clinical practice.

下肢静脉溃疡的愈合速度和愈合时间:神经肌肉电刺激作为压迫治疗辅助的真实世界服务评估。
目的:对神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)作为压迫治疗的辅助手段进行服务评价,并与匹配的回顾性对照组比较伤口边缘推进率和愈合时间。方法:15例下肢静脉性溃疡患者给予NMES,每日6小时,持续56天或至伤口愈合(以先发生者为准),并给予多层压迫。选择伤口的大小,纳入标准最大为12 cm2。伤口进展与15例溃疡大小和持续时间匹配的回顾性对照患者进行比较。结果:回顾性组的愈合率为0.31 mm/周(95% CI, 29-37 mm/周),而前瞻性压缩加NMES组的愈合率为0.56 mm/周(95% CI, 50-62 mm/周;P = .004)。两组伤口均在服务评价中完全愈合。回顾性组平均闭合时间为77天(95% CI, 66-88天),而NMES组平均闭合时间为40天(95% CI, 37-43天;P = .005)。结论:与回顾性对照相比,将腓总神经的NMES加入到包括多组分压迫的护理束中,可显著加快伤口边缘的进展,显著缩短愈合时间。该方法的未来随机对照试验或自我对照研究将为临床实践提供极大的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信