Bernhard Steinberger, Poulami Roy, Michael Pons, Matteo Paul Jopke
{"title":"Why Are Plume Excess Temperatures Much Less Than the Temperature Drop Across the Lowermost-Mantle Thermal Boundary Layer?","authors":"Bernhard Steinberger, Poulami Roy, Michael Pons, Matteo Paul Jopke","doi":"10.1029/2024JB030111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While temperature drop across the mantle's basal thermal boundary layer (TBL) is likely <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>></mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${ >} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>1,000 K, the temperature anomaly of plumes believed to rise from that TBL is only up to a few hundred Kelvins. Reasons for that discrepancy are still poorly understood and a number of causes have been proposed. Here, we use the ASPECT software to model plumes from the lowermost mantle and study their excess temperatures. We use a mantle viscosity that depends on temperature and depth with a strong viscosity increase from below the lithosphere toward the lower mantle, reaching about <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <msup>\n <mn>0</mn>\n <mn>23</mn>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $1{0}^{23}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> Pas above the basal TBL, consistent with geoid modeling and slow motion of mantle plumes. With a mineral physics-derived pyrolite material model, the difference between a plume adiabat and an ambient mantle adiabat just below the lithosphere is about two thirds of that at the base of the mantle, for example, 1,280 versus 835 K. 3D models of isolated plumes become nearly steady-state <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>></mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${ >} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>10–20 Myr after the plume head has reached the surface, with excess temperature drop compared to an adiabat for material directly from the core-mantle boundary (CMB) usually less than 100 K. In the Earth, plumes are likely triggered by slabs and probably rise preferably above the margins of chemically distinct piles. This could lead to reduced excess temperatures, if plumes are more sheet-like, similar to 2D models, or temperature at their source depth is less than at the CMB. Excess temperatures are further reduced when averaged over the plume conduit or melting region.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB030111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While temperature drop across the mantle's basal thermal boundary layer (TBL) is likely 1,000 K, the temperature anomaly of plumes believed to rise from that TBL is only up to a few hundred Kelvins. Reasons for that discrepancy are still poorly understood and a number of causes have been proposed. Here, we use the ASPECT software to model plumes from the lowermost mantle and study their excess temperatures. We use a mantle viscosity that depends on temperature and depth with a strong viscosity increase from below the lithosphere toward the lower mantle, reaching about Pas above the basal TBL, consistent with geoid modeling and slow motion of mantle plumes. With a mineral physics-derived pyrolite material model, the difference between a plume adiabat and an ambient mantle adiabat just below the lithosphere is about two thirds of that at the base of the mantle, for example, 1,280 versus 835 K. 3D models of isolated plumes become nearly steady-state 10–20 Myr after the plume head has reached the surface, with excess temperature drop compared to an adiabat for material directly from the core-mantle boundary (CMB) usually less than 100 K. In the Earth, plumes are likely triggered by slabs and probably rise preferably above the margins of chemically distinct piles. This could lead to reduced excess temperatures, if plumes are more sheet-like, similar to 2D models, or temperature at their source depth is less than at the CMB. Excess temperatures are further reduced when averaged over the plume conduit or melting region.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.