Impact bending strength and structural properties of hardwood: branch versus stem

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Tobias Nenning, Johannes Konnerth, Wolfgang Gindl-Altmutter, Michael Grabner, Christian Hansmann, Lukas Eder, Sabine Bodner, Maximilian Pramreiter
{"title":"Impact bending strength and structural properties of hardwood: branch versus stem","authors":"Tobias Nenning,&nbsp;Johannes Konnerth,&nbsp;Wolfgang Gindl-Altmutter,&nbsp;Michael Grabner,&nbsp;Christian Hansmann,&nbsp;Lukas Eder,&nbsp;Sabine Bodner,&nbsp;Maximilian Pramreiter","doi":"10.1007/s00107-025-02247-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The branches of deciduous trees are optimised by nature to allow continuous adaptation and response to changing environmental conditions. As a result, the morphology and internal structure of the wood branches are often more variable than in the stem. Quantitatively, branches and stem tops represent 20–50% of the volume of the above-ground biomass of deciduous trees, which is currently under-utilized and mainly burned. To enable a higher-value application as a safe construction material, a comprehensive technological profile of branch wood is a prerequisite. Therefore, we performed single-blow impact pendulum tests in tangential wood direction on branch and stem wood samples of beech, oak, and poplar to investigate their relationship with wood density, macrostructural properties, fibre properties, and microfibril orientation of selected samples. Our results showed that the significant differences in mean impact bending strength between branch and stem for all species could not be explained by wood density. However, branch and stem wood with higher toughness are generally associated with longer fibres. Overall, branches showed higher MFA (microfibril angle) and lower fibre length compared to stems. We found that higher toughness in selected beech samples was associated with higher density and lower MFA. While oak also had a lower MFA, poplar had a higher MFA in high-toughness samples. Our empirical results provide insights into the species-specific structure-property relationships of hardwood branches, improving the understanding of their properties and variability, and potentially informing their use in structural applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":550,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","volume":"83 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00107-025-02247-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-025-02247-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The branches of deciduous trees are optimised by nature to allow continuous adaptation and response to changing environmental conditions. As a result, the morphology and internal structure of the wood branches are often more variable than in the stem. Quantitatively, branches and stem tops represent 20–50% of the volume of the above-ground biomass of deciduous trees, which is currently under-utilized and mainly burned. To enable a higher-value application as a safe construction material, a comprehensive technological profile of branch wood is a prerequisite. Therefore, we performed single-blow impact pendulum tests in tangential wood direction on branch and stem wood samples of beech, oak, and poplar to investigate their relationship with wood density, macrostructural properties, fibre properties, and microfibril orientation of selected samples. Our results showed that the significant differences in mean impact bending strength between branch and stem for all species could not be explained by wood density. However, branch and stem wood with higher toughness are generally associated with longer fibres. Overall, branches showed higher MFA (microfibril angle) and lower fibre length compared to stems. We found that higher toughness in selected beech samples was associated with higher density and lower MFA. While oak also had a lower MFA, poplar had a higher MFA in high-toughness samples. Our empirical results provide insights into the species-specific structure-property relationships of hardwood branches, improving the understanding of their properties and variability, and potentially informing their use in structural applications.

硬木的冲击弯曲强度和结构特性:枝与茎
落叶树木的树枝被大自然优化,以允许不断适应和响应不断变化的环境条件。因此,木枝的形态和内部结构往往比茎的变化更大。在数量上,落叶乔木的枝和茎顶占地上生物量的20-50%,目前利用不足,主要是燃烧。为了实现更高价值的应用,作为一种安全的建筑材料,枝材的综合技术概况是一个先决条件。因此,我们对山毛榉、橡树和杨树的枝条和茎材样品进行了木材切向单击冲击摆试验,研究了它们与选定样品的木材密度、宏观结构性能、纤维性能和微纤维取向的关系。结果表明,不同树种树枝和树干的平均抗冲击强度差异不能用木材密度来解释。然而,具有较高韧性的枝材和茎材通常具有较长的纤维。总体而言,与茎相比,分枝表现出更高的MFA(微纤维角)和更低的纤维长度。我们发现,在所选的山毛榉样品中,较高的韧性与较高的密度和较低的MFA相关。而橡木也有较低的MFA,杨树有较高的MFA在高韧性样品。我们的经验结果提供了对硬木枝的物种特异性结构-性质关系的见解,提高了对其性质和变异性的理解,并有可能为其在结构应用中的使用提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products reports on original research and new developments in the field of wood and wood products and their biological, chemical, physical as well as mechanical and technological properties, processes and uses. Subjects range from roundwood to wood based products, composite materials and structural applications, with related jointing techniques. Moreover, it deals with wood as a chemical raw material, source of energy as well as with inter-disciplinary aspects of environmental assessment and international markets. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products aims at promoting international scientific communication and transfer of new technologies from research into practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信