Weina Zhu , Tianzheng Luo , Tianpeng Wang , Zhi Sun , Xiaodong Li
{"title":"Does the carbon emission trading system facilitate public building carbon dioxide emission reduction in China?","authors":"Weina Zhu , Tianzheng Luo , Tianpeng Wang , Zhi Sun , Xiaodong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a quantitative environmental regulation method, carbon emission trading system (CETS) aims to reduce carbon emission at a low cost. However, whether the pilot policy effectively reduces the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emission in the public building sector in China remains uncertain. This study examines the impact of pilot CETS on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction of public buildings by employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model using provincial data from 2008 to 2020. And it also identifies the mechanisms behind CETS's influence through a mediating effect model. The key findings include: (1) the pilot CETS reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emission intensity of the public buildings; (2) green technology innovation is the primary channel through which CETS promotes CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction of public buildings; (3) heterogeneity analysis presents that the emission reduction effects vary geographically, with a more pronounced effect in northern pilot regions; additionally, the emission reduction effects also alter depending on energy types, with electricity-related emissions reduction proving more suitable for the CETS than fossil fuel emission. This paper provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of pilot CETS policy in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emission in the public building sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 112953"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As a quantitative environmental regulation method, carbon emission trading system (CETS) aims to reduce carbon emission at a low cost. However, whether the pilot policy effectively reduces the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in the public building sector in China remains uncertain. This study examines the impact of pilot CETS on CO2 emissions reduction of public buildings by employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model using provincial data from 2008 to 2020. And it also identifies the mechanisms behind CETS's influence through a mediating effect model. The key findings include: (1) the pilot CETS reduces CO2 emission intensity of the public buildings; (2) green technology innovation is the primary channel through which CETS promotes CO2 emission reduction of public buildings; (3) heterogeneity analysis presents that the emission reduction effects vary geographically, with a more pronounced effect in northern pilot regions; additionally, the emission reduction effects also alter depending on energy types, with electricity-related emissions reduction proving more suitable for the CETS than fossil fuel emission. This paper provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of pilot CETS policy in reducing CO2 emission in the public building sector.
期刊介绍:
Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.