Does the carbon emission trading system facilitate public building carbon dioxide emission reduction in China?

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Weina Zhu , Tianzheng Luo , Tianpeng Wang , Zhi Sun , Xiaodong Li
{"title":"Does the carbon emission trading system facilitate public building carbon dioxide emission reduction in China?","authors":"Weina Zhu ,&nbsp;Tianzheng Luo ,&nbsp;Tianpeng Wang ,&nbsp;Zhi Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a quantitative environmental regulation method, carbon emission trading system (CETS) aims to reduce carbon emission at a low cost. However, whether the pilot policy effectively reduces the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emission in the public building sector in China remains uncertain. This study examines the impact of pilot CETS on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction of public buildings by employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model using provincial data from 2008 to 2020. And it also identifies the mechanisms behind CETS's influence through a mediating effect model. The key findings include: (1) the pilot CETS reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emission intensity of the public buildings; (2) green technology innovation is the primary channel through which CETS promotes CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction of public buildings; (3) heterogeneity analysis presents that the emission reduction effects vary geographically, with a more pronounced effect in northern pilot regions; additionally, the emission reduction effects also alter depending on energy types, with electricity-related emissions reduction proving more suitable for the CETS than fossil fuel emission. This paper provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of pilot CETS policy in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emission in the public building sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 112953"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a quantitative environmental regulation method, carbon emission trading system (CETS) aims to reduce carbon emission at a low cost. However, whether the pilot policy effectively reduces the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in the public building sector in China remains uncertain. This study examines the impact of pilot CETS on CO2 emissions reduction of public buildings by employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model using provincial data from 2008 to 2020. And it also identifies the mechanisms behind CETS's influence through a mediating effect model. The key findings include: (1) the pilot CETS reduces CO2 emission intensity of the public buildings; (2) green technology innovation is the primary channel through which CETS promotes CO2 emission reduction of public buildings; (3) heterogeneity analysis presents that the emission reduction effects vary geographically, with a more pronounced effect in northern pilot regions; additionally, the emission reduction effects also alter depending on energy types, with electricity-related emissions reduction proving more suitable for the CETS than fossil fuel emission. This paper provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of pilot CETS policy in reducing CO2 emission in the public building sector.

Abstract Image

碳排放权交易制度是否有利于中国公共建筑的二氧化碳减排?
碳排放交易体系(CETS)作为一种环境定量调控方法,旨在以较低的成本减少碳排放。然而,试点政策是否能有效减少中国公共建筑领域的二氧化碳排放量仍不确定。本研究利用 2008 年至 2020 年的省级数据,采用差分法(DID)模型,研究了试点 CETS 对公共建筑二氧化碳减排的影响。本研究还通过中介效应模型确定了 CETS 影响背后的机制。主要结论包括(1) CETS 试点降低了公共建筑的二氧化碳排放强度;(2) 绿色技术创新是 CETS 促进公共建筑二氧化碳减排的主要渠道;(3) 异质性分析表明,减排效果因地域而异,北方试点地区的效果更为明显;此外,减排效果还因能源类型而异,与化石燃料排放相比,电力相关的减排更适合 CETS。本文提供了实证证据,证明了公用事业节能减排试点政策在减少公共建筑领域二氧化碳排放方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信