Probabilistic back-analysis of earthquake-induced 3D landslide model parameters and risk assessment for secondary slide

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Lihang Hu , Gang Wang , Kiyonobu Kasama
{"title":"Probabilistic back-analysis of earthquake-induced 3D landslide model parameters and risk assessment for secondary slide","authors":"Lihang Hu ,&nbsp;Gang Wang ,&nbsp;Kiyonobu Kasama","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Back-analysis is an effective method for rapidly estimating soil strength parameters. However, soil spatial variability and the influence of autocorrelation function (ACF) are often inadequately considered. This study presents an efficient probabilistic Bayesian back-analysis for spatially varying soil parameters in earthquake-induced 3D landslide models. A surrogate model based on the Variance Reduction Stochastic Response Surface Method (VRSRSM) is proposed, incorporating five different variance reduction functions associated with ACFs to address the spatial variability of 3D slope under seismic conditions. An improved Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling method facilitates Bayesian inference with minimal computational effort. The approach is validated using a 3D simple slope under seismic conditions, accounting for numerical model uncertainty. A case study of a deep-seated landslide from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake is then used to back-analyze soil strength parameters and unit weight, which are subsequently utilized for risk assessment of secondary slide under aftershocks. Results indicate that VRSRM accurately approximates both 3D simple slope and real landslide models, while the commonly used single exponential ACF yields an unconservative factor of safety, affecting the accuracy of the back-analyzed soil parameters. This proposed approach offers an effective tool for rapidly determining spatially varying soil parameters from landslide events, enhancing risk assessment for future aftershocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"352 ","pages":"Article 108062"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225001589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Back-analysis is an effective method for rapidly estimating soil strength parameters. However, soil spatial variability and the influence of autocorrelation function (ACF) are often inadequately considered. This study presents an efficient probabilistic Bayesian back-analysis for spatially varying soil parameters in earthquake-induced 3D landslide models. A surrogate model based on the Variance Reduction Stochastic Response Surface Method (VRSRSM) is proposed, incorporating five different variance reduction functions associated with ACFs to address the spatial variability of 3D slope under seismic conditions. An improved Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling method facilitates Bayesian inference with minimal computational effort. The approach is validated using a 3D simple slope under seismic conditions, accounting for numerical model uncertainty. A case study of a deep-seated landslide from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake is then used to back-analyze soil strength parameters and unit weight, which are subsequently utilized for risk assessment of secondary slide under aftershocks. Results indicate that VRSRM accurately approximates both 3D simple slope and real landslide models, while the commonly used single exponential ACF yields an unconservative factor of safety, affecting the accuracy of the back-analyzed soil parameters. This proposed approach offers an effective tool for rapidly determining spatially varying soil parameters from landslide events, enhancing risk assessment for future aftershocks.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信