The association of alliance, the bond with the treatment team, and group cohesion with self-esteem and quality of life in day clinic treatment of depression

Q3 Psychology
Catherine Irniger , Johannes Vetter , Franziska Mürner , Steffi Weidt , Erich Seifritz , Martin grosse Holtforth , Rainer Krähenmann
{"title":"The association of alliance, the bond with the treatment team, and group cohesion with self-esteem and quality of life in day clinic treatment of depression","authors":"Catherine Irniger ,&nbsp;Johannes Vetter ,&nbsp;Franziska Mürner ,&nbsp;Steffi Weidt ,&nbsp;Erich Seifritz ,&nbsp;Martin grosse Holtforth ,&nbsp;Rainer Krähenmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In day clinic treatment, patients engage not only with their psychotherapists, but also with fellow patients and other members of the treatment team. Given that interpersonal difficulties are a core component in the treatment of depression, these additional relationships could be of special relevance. However, compared to alliance little is known how other relationships experienced during treatment relate to outcome. Thus, the aim of the analysis was to examine the potentially beneficial association of different types of relationships with outcome in day clinic treatment of depression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The relationships were assessed with the Inpatient and Day-Clinic Experience Scale (IDES) including the subscales bond with the psychotherapist, bond with the treatment team, and group cohesion. Treatment outcome was assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), and the European Health Interview Survey - Quality of Life (EUROHIS-QOL). For both outcome measures, residual gain scores were computed, and a path analysis was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Whereas higher levels of group cohesion were associated with more increase in self-esteem, a stronger bond with the psychotherapist was associated with more increase in quality of life. For the bond with the treatment team no significant association with treatment outcome was observed.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The results highlight distinct associations of different types of relationships with treatment outcome in depression. Limitations such as the limited sample size, high number of male patients, and high staff turnover are discussed. Future research should further explore the association of different therapeutic relationships with outcome as well as the associated mechanisms of action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915325000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In day clinic treatment, patients engage not only with their psychotherapists, but also with fellow patients and other members of the treatment team. Given that interpersonal difficulties are a core component in the treatment of depression, these additional relationships could be of special relevance. However, compared to alliance little is known how other relationships experienced during treatment relate to outcome. Thus, the aim of the analysis was to examine the potentially beneficial association of different types of relationships with outcome in day clinic treatment of depression.

Methods

The relationships were assessed with the Inpatient and Day-Clinic Experience Scale (IDES) including the subscales bond with the psychotherapist, bond with the treatment team, and group cohesion. Treatment outcome was assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), and the European Health Interview Survey - Quality of Life (EUROHIS-QOL). For both outcome measures, residual gain scores were computed, and a path analysis was conducted.

Results

Whereas higher levels of group cohesion were associated with more increase in self-esteem, a stronger bond with the psychotherapist was associated with more increase in quality of life. For the bond with the treatment team no significant association with treatment outcome was observed.

Discussion

The results highlight distinct associations of different types of relationships with treatment outcome in depression. Limitations such as the limited sample size, high number of male patients, and high staff turnover are discussed. Future research should further explore the association of different therapeutic relationships with outcome as well as the associated mechanisms of action.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信