The association of alliance, the bond with the treatment team, and group cohesion with self-esteem and quality of life in day clinic treatment of depression

Q3 Psychology
Catherine Irniger , Johannes Vetter , Franziska Mürner , Steffi Weidt , Erich Seifritz , Martin grosse Holtforth , Rainer Krähenmann
{"title":"The association of alliance, the bond with the treatment team, and group cohesion with self-esteem and quality of life in day clinic treatment of depression","authors":"Catherine Irniger ,&nbsp;Johannes Vetter ,&nbsp;Franziska Mürner ,&nbsp;Steffi Weidt ,&nbsp;Erich Seifritz ,&nbsp;Martin grosse Holtforth ,&nbsp;Rainer Krähenmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In day clinic treatment, patients engage not only with their psychotherapists, but also with fellow patients and other members of the treatment team. Given that interpersonal difficulties are a core component in the treatment of depression, these additional relationships could be of special relevance. However, compared to alliance little is known how other relationships experienced during treatment relate to outcome. Thus, the aim of the analysis was to examine the potentially beneficial association of different types of relationships with outcome in day clinic treatment of depression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The relationships were assessed with the Inpatient and Day-Clinic Experience Scale (IDES) including the subscales bond with the psychotherapist, bond with the treatment team, and group cohesion. Treatment outcome was assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), and the European Health Interview Survey - Quality of Life (EUROHIS-QOL). For both outcome measures, residual gain scores were computed, and a path analysis was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Whereas higher levels of group cohesion were associated with more increase in self-esteem, a stronger bond with the psychotherapist was associated with more increase in quality of life. For the bond with the treatment team no significant association with treatment outcome was observed.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The results highlight distinct associations of different types of relationships with treatment outcome in depression. Limitations such as the limited sample size, high number of male patients, and high staff turnover are discussed. Future research should further explore the association of different therapeutic relationships with outcome as well as the associated mechanisms of action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915325000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In day clinic treatment, patients engage not only with their psychotherapists, but also with fellow patients and other members of the treatment team. Given that interpersonal difficulties are a core component in the treatment of depression, these additional relationships could be of special relevance. However, compared to alliance little is known how other relationships experienced during treatment relate to outcome. Thus, the aim of the analysis was to examine the potentially beneficial association of different types of relationships with outcome in day clinic treatment of depression.

Methods

The relationships were assessed with the Inpatient and Day-Clinic Experience Scale (IDES) including the subscales bond with the psychotherapist, bond with the treatment team, and group cohesion. Treatment outcome was assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), and the European Health Interview Survey - Quality of Life (EUROHIS-QOL). For both outcome measures, residual gain scores were computed, and a path analysis was conducted.

Results

Whereas higher levels of group cohesion were associated with more increase in self-esteem, a stronger bond with the psychotherapist was associated with more increase in quality of life. For the bond with the treatment team no significant association with treatment outcome was observed.

Discussion

The results highlight distinct associations of different types of relationships with treatment outcome in depression. Limitations such as the limited sample size, high number of male patients, and high staff turnover are discussed. Future research should further explore the association of different therapeutic relationships with outcome as well as the associated mechanisms of action.
抑郁症日间门诊治疗的联盟、与治疗团队的联系、团体凝聚力与自尊和生活质量的关系
在日间门诊治疗中,患者不仅与他们的心理治疗师交流,还与其他患者和治疗小组的其他成员交流。鉴于人际关系困难是抑郁症治疗的核心组成部分,这些额外的关系可能具有特殊的相关性。然而,与联盟相比,我们对治疗期间的其他关系与结果的关系知之甚少。因此,分析的目的是检查不同类型的关系与抑郁症日间门诊治疗结果的潜在有益关联。方法采用住院和日间门诊经验量表(IDES),包括与心理治疗师的联系、与治疗团队的联系和群体凝聚力三个分量表,对心理治疗师的关系进行评估。采用Rosenberg自尊量表(RSE)和欧洲健康访谈调查-生活质量(EUROHIS-QOL)评估治疗结果。对于两种结果测量,计算剩余增益评分,并进行通径分析。结果:高水平的群体凝聚力与自尊的增加有关,而与心理治疗师更紧密的联系与生活质量的提高有关。对于与治疗团队的联系,没有观察到与治疗结果的显著关联。讨论结果强调了不同类型的关系与抑郁症治疗结果的明显关联。局限性,如有限的样本量,高数量的男性患者,高人员流动率进行了讨论。未来的研究应进一步探索不同治疗关系与结果的关系以及相关的作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信