{"title":"Association between adiposity distribution and low-grade systemic inflammation: Tackling multicollinearity","authors":"Vanda Craveiro , Milton Severo , Elisabete Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.nut.2025.112737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the association between adiposity distribution and low-grade systemic inflammation, testing how the statistical approach can be used to tackle the multicollinearity between variables of adiposity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional analysis of 987 adults (27 years old) from the EPITeen cohort (Porto, Portugal). Adiposity distribution was assessed based on the fat distribution of the participants, measured by whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Low-grade systemic inflammation was determined based on the serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) of the participants. The associations were estimated by linear regression models, stratified by sex, and multicollinearity between variables of adiposity was considered.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The association (standardized β [95%CI]) between total body fat and hsCRP (ln) was 0.332 (0.252, 0.411) in women and 0.256 (0.175, 0.337) in men. Finally, in women, the association (standardized β [95%CI]) with hsCRP (ln) was −0.014 (−0.094, 0.065) for limb fat and 0.019 (−0.061, 0.099) for trunk fat, and, in men it was −0.136 (−0.216, −0.056) for limb fat and 0.130 (0.050, 0.211) for trunk fat.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>After a comprehensive study of fat, its overall proinflammatory effect was acknowledged. Trunk fat was more proinflammatory than limb fat, even though the results were only statistically significant in men. Statistical analysis should consider multicollinearity between variables of adiposity, though simpler models could be used to address this problem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19482,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 112737"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900725000553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To examine the association between adiposity distribution and low-grade systemic inflammation, testing how the statistical approach can be used to tackle the multicollinearity between variables of adiposity.
Methods
Cross-sectional analysis of 987 adults (27 years old) from the EPITeen cohort (Porto, Portugal). Adiposity distribution was assessed based on the fat distribution of the participants, measured by whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Low-grade systemic inflammation was determined based on the serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) of the participants. The associations were estimated by linear regression models, stratified by sex, and multicollinearity between variables of adiposity was considered.
Results
The association (standardized β [95%CI]) between total body fat and hsCRP (ln) was 0.332 (0.252, 0.411) in women and 0.256 (0.175, 0.337) in men. Finally, in women, the association (standardized β [95%CI]) with hsCRP (ln) was −0.014 (−0.094, 0.065) for limb fat and 0.019 (−0.061, 0.099) for trunk fat, and, in men it was −0.136 (−0.216, −0.056) for limb fat and 0.130 (0.050, 0.211) for trunk fat.
Conclusions
After a comprehensive study of fat, its overall proinflammatory effect was acknowledged. Trunk fat was more proinflammatory than limb fat, even though the results were only statistically significant in men. Statistical analysis should consider multicollinearity between variables of adiposity, though simpler models could be used to address this problem.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition has an open access mirror journal Nutrition: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
Founded by Michael M. Meguid in the early 1980''s, Nutrition presents advances in nutrition research and science, informs its readers on new and advancing technologies and data in clinical nutrition practice, encourages the application of outcomes research and meta-analyses to problems in patient-related nutrition; and seeks to help clarify and set the research, policy and practice agenda for nutrition science to enhance human well-being in the years ahead.