Accurate identification of Enterococcus lactis causing bacteraemia by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Marhami Fahriani, Geoffrey W Coombs, Princy Shoby, Haley Hood, Denise A Daley, Christopher A Mullally, Shakeel Mowlaboccus
{"title":"Accurate identification of <i>Enterococcus lactis</i> causing bacteraemia by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.","authors":"Marhami Fahriani, Geoffrey W Coombs, Princy Shoby, Haley Hood, Denise A Daley, Christopher A Mullally, Shakeel Mowlaboccus","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> clade B has recently been re-classified as <i>Enterococcus lactis</i>. Although <i>E. lactis</i> was previously associated with food products and probiotics, the recent re-classification has prompted the need for the accurate identification of this species and re-interpretation of its disease-causing ability. Since the re-classified <i>E. lactis</i> can currently only be identified by molecular techniques such as whole-genome sequencing, we constructed a MALDI Biotyper<sup>®</sup> custom database to rapidly identify and differentiate <i>E. lactis</i> causing bacteraemia from <i>E. faecium</i>.<b>Hypothesis/Gap statement.</b> The re-classification of <i>E. faecium</i> clade B as <i>E. lactis</i> warrants the development of rapid and accurate identification methods to distinguish these species, particularly in clinical settings where <i>E. lactis</i> may be misidentified as <i>E. faecium</i>.<b>Aim.</b> The aim of this study was to construct a MALDI Biotyper<sup>®</sup> custom database to rapidly identify and differentiate <i>E. lactis</i> causing bacteraemia from <i>E. faecium</i>.<b>Methodology.</b> A total of 97 enterococcal isolates, including 38 <i>E. lactis</i>, 51 <i>E. faecium</i> and 8 non-<i>E. faecium</i> non-<i>E. lactis</i> enterococci (<i>E. avium</i>, <i>E. casseliflavus</i>, <i>E. cecorum</i>, <i>E. durans</i>, <i>E. faecalis</i>, <i>E. faecium</i>, <i>E. gallinarum</i>, <i>E. lactis</i>, <i>E. mundtii</i> and <i>E. raffinosus</i>) were investigated. Whole-genome sequence analysis was used to confirm the species of each isolate. A MALDI Biotyper<sup>®</sup> in-house database was constructed using 29 <i>E. lactis</i> isolates and the ethanol/formic acid/acetonitrile preparation protocol. The in-house database was validated using the 97 enterococcal isolates and the extended direct transfer preparation protocol.<b>Results.</b> Our in-house database correctly identified all isolates at the species level, including the <i>E. lactis</i> isolates, all of which were misidentified as <i>E. faecium</i> by the BioTyper<sup>®</sup> MBT Compass reference library (2022). Of the 38 <i>E. lactis</i> isolates, 84.2% (<i>n</i>=32) were identified at the high probable species level (score ≥2.300), while the remaining 15.8% (<i>n</i>=6) were identified at the probable species level (score 2.000-2.299). Similarly, all <i>E. faecium</i> isolates (<i>n</i>=51) were accurately identified, including 84.3% (<i>n</i>=43/51) identified at the high probable species level and 15.7% (<i>n</i>=8/51) identified at the probable species level.<b>Conclusion.</b> Our study provides a ready-to-use custom MALDI spectral database that can be implemented in clinical diagnostic and research laboratories to accurately identify <i>E. lactis,</i> which is currently misidentified as <i>E. faecium</i> by the standard spectrum database available on commercial platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Enterococcus faecium clade B has recently been re-classified as Enterococcus lactis. Although E. lactis was previously associated with food products and probiotics, the recent re-classification has prompted the need for the accurate identification of this species and re-interpretation of its disease-causing ability. Since the re-classified E. lactis can currently only be identified by molecular techniques such as whole-genome sequencing, we constructed a MALDI Biotyper® custom database to rapidly identify and differentiate E. lactis causing bacteraemia from E. faecium.Hypothesis/Gap statement. The re-classification of E. faecium clade B as E. lactis warrants the development of rapid and accurate identification methods to distinguish these species, particularly in clinical settings where E. lactis may be misidentified as E. faecium.Aim. The aim of this study was to construct a MALDI Biotyper® custom database to rapidly identify and differentiate E. lactis causing bacteraemia from E. faecium.Methodology. A total of 97 enterococcal isolates, including 38 E. lactis, 51 E. faecium and 8 non-E. faecium non-E. lactis enterococci (E. avium, E. casseliflavus, E. cecorum, E. durans, E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. gallinarum, E. lactis, E. mundtii and E. raffinosus) were investigated. Whole-genome sequence analysis was used to confirm the species of each isolate. A MALDI Biotyper® in-house database was constructed using 29 E. lactis isolates and the ethanol/formic acid/acetonitrile preparation protocol. The in-house database was validated using the 97 enterococcal isolates and the extended direct transfer preparation protocol.Results. Our in-house database correctly identified all isolates at the species level, including the E. lactis isolates, all of which were misidentified as E. faecium by the BioTyper® MBT Compass reference library (2022). Of the 38 E. lactis isolates, 84.2% (n=32) were identified at the high probable species level (score ≥2.300), while the remaining 15.8% (n=6) were identified at the probable species level (score 2.000-2.299). Similarly, all E. faecium isolates (n=51) were accurately identified, including 84.3% (n=43/51) identified at the high probable species level and 15.7% (n=8/51) identified at the probable species level.Conclusion. Our study provides a ready-to-use custom MALDI spectral database that can be implemented in clinical diagnostic and research laboratories to accurately identify E. lactis, which is currently misidentified as E. faecium by the standard spectrum database available on commercial platforms.

基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法准确鉴定致菌血症的乳酸肠球菌。
介绍。粪肠球菌B支最近被重新归类为乳酸肠球菌。虽然乳杆菌以前与食品和益生菌有关,但最近的重新分类提示需要准确鉴定该物种并重新解释其致病能力。由于重新分类的乳杆菌目前只能通过全基因组测序等分子技术进行鉴定,因此我们构建了MALDI Biotyper®定制数据库,以快速鉴定和区分引起菌血症的乳杆菌和粪杆菌。假设/差距语句。粪肠杆菌B分支被重新分类为乳肠杆菌,保证了快速和准确识别方法的发展,以区分这些物种,特别是在临床环境中,乳肠杆菌可能被误认为是粪肠杆菌。本研究的目的是建立MALDI Biotyper®定制数据库,以快速识别和区分引起菌血症的乳乳杆菌和粪乳杆菌。共分离97株肠球菌,其中乳杆菌38株,粪杆菌51株,非乳杆菌8株。都有效non-E。调查了乳肠球菌(鸟肠球菌、casseliflavus肠球菌、cecorum肠球菌、durans肠球菌、faecalis肠球菌、faecium肠球菌、gallinarum肠球菌、lacactis肠球菌、mundtii肠球菌和raffinosus肠球菌)。采用全基因组序列分析确定各分离株的种类。使用29株乳酸菌分离株和乙醇/甲酸/乙腈制备方案,建立MALDI Biotyper®内部数据库。使用97株肠球菌分离物和扩展的直接转移制备方案对内部数据库进行验证。我们的内部数据库在物种水平上正确识别了所有分离株,包括E. lacactis分离株,所有分离株都被BioTyper®MBT Compass参考库(2022)错误识别为E. faecium。38株乳酸乳杆菌分离株中,高可能种(≥2.300)鉴定的占84.2% (n=32),可能种(2000 ~ 2.299)鉴定的占15.8% (n=6)。所有分离株(n=51)均被准确鉴定,其中高可能种鉴定率为84.3% (n=43/51),可能种鉴定率为15.7% (n=8/51)。我们的研究提供了一个随时可用的定制MALDI光谱数据库,可以在临床诊断和研究实验室中实施,以准确识别乳杆菌,目前被商业平台上可用的标准光谱数据库错误地识别为粪杆菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信