Advanced cardiac imaging modalities in U.S. heart transplant centers: availability and distribution.

Maria Alwan, Attila Feher, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Ahmed Sayed, Ahmad El Yaman, Asim Shaikh, Mouaz H Al-Mallah
{"title":"Advanced cardiac imaging modalities in U.S. heart transplant centers: availability and distribution.","authors":"Maria Alwan, Attila Feher, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Ahmed Sayed, Ahmad El Yaman, Asim Shaikh, Mouaz H Al-Mallah","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03389-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the availability of advanced imaging modalities, including cardiac computed tomography (CCT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiac positron emission tomography (PET), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)/optical coherence tomography (OCT), at Medicare-approved heart transplant centers across the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved the list of Medicare-approved heart transplant centers and data on physicians billing for cardiac imaging procedures from the CMS website. Addresses of billing physicians were matched with those of heart transplant centers to determine the availability of imaging modalities at each center. Additionally, we calculated the number of available imaging modalities and the median volume of studies per center. Further, we mapped heart transplant centers along with their available modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 129 Medicare-approved heart transplant centers, 90.7% offered CCT, 85.3% provided CMR, 74.4% had IVUS/OCT, and 55% offered cardiac PET. Only 39.5% of centers had all four modalities available. Geographic disparities were observed, with clustering of centers and modalities in the Northeast and West Coast and fewer centers in the Midwest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights disparities in the availability of advanced imaging modalities in heart transplant centers across the United States. While CCT and CMR are widely available, the availability of cardiac PET and IVUS/OCT remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03389-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the availability of advanced imaging modalities, including cardiac computed tomography (CCT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiac positron emission tomography (PET), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)/optical coherence tomography (OCT), at Medicare-approved heart transplant centers across the United States.

Methods: We retrieved the list of Medicare-approved heart transplant centers and data on physicians billing for cardiac imaging procedures from the CMS website. Addresses of billing physicians were matched with those of heart transplant centers to determine the availability of imaging modalities at each center. Additionally, we calculated the number of available imaging modalities and the median volume of studies per center. Further, we mapped heart transplant centers along with their available modalities.

Results: Of 129 Medicare-approved heart transplant centers, 90.7% offered CCT, 85.3% provided CMR, 74.4% had IVUS/OCT, and 55% offered cardiac PET. Only 39.5% of centers had all four modalities available. Geographic disparities were observed, with clustering of centers and modalities in the Northeast and West Coast and fewer centers in the Midwest.

Conclusion: This study highlights disparities in the availability of advanced imaging modalities in heart transplant centers across the United States. While CCT and CMR are widely available, the availability of cardiac PET and IVUS/OCT remains limited.

目的:本研究评估了美国联邦医疗保险(Medicare)批准的心脏移植中心先进成像模式的可用性,包括心脏计算机断层扫描(CCT)、心脏磁共振(CMR)、心脏正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和血管内超声波(IVUS)/光学相干断层扫描(OCT):我们从 CMS 网站上检索了医疗保险批准的心脏移植中心名单和心脏成像程序开单医生的数据。将开单医生的地址与心脏移植中心的地址进行比对,以确定每个中心是否有成像模式。此外,我们还计算了每个中心可用成像方式的数量和检查量的中位数。此外,我们还绘制了心脏移植中心及其可用模式的地图:在 129 家获得医疗保险批准的心脏移植中心中,90.7% 提供 CCT,85.3% 提供 CMR,74.4% 提供 IVUS/OCT,55% 提供心脏 PET。只有 39.5% 的中心提供所有四种模式。研究还发现了地域差异,东北部和西海岸的中心和模式较多,而中西部的中心较少:本研究强调了全美心脏移植中心在先进成像模式可用性方面的差异。虽然CCT和CMR已广泛普及,但心脏正电子发射计算机断层显像和IVUS/OCT的可用性仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信