Description and Evaluation of Practice-Based Training in OUD Care for Hospital-Based Generalist Physicians.

Andrea Jakubowski, Sumeet Singh-Tan, Tiffany Lu, Aaron Fox
{"title":"Description and Evaluation of Practice-Based Training in OUD Care for Hospital-Based Generalist Physicians.","authors":"Andrea Jakubowski, Sumeet Singh-Tan, Tiffany Lu, Aaron Fox","doi":"10.1177/29767342251330021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalizations are important opportunities to deliver evidence-based opioid use disorder (OUD) care, yet most hospital-based generalist physicians receive minimal OUD training. We describe a novel OUD training for generalists and mixed-methods evaluation in a large urban hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>Training Description:</i> Hospital-based generalist physicians received a single, 1-hour, small-group, in-person OUD training (OUD diagnosis, initiating medications for OUD [MOUD], and discharge planning) and post-training support. <i>Evaluation:</i> We examined self-reported changes in knowledge, confidence, skill, and frequency of providing OUD care; barriers and facilitators to applying training skills; and suggestions for training modification. Data collection included the following: (1) end-of-training questionnaires; (2) 12-month follow-up questionnaires (retrospective pre-post-design); and (3) qualitative interviews and a focus group. Stuart Maxwell tests were used to examine pre-/post-differences in knowledge, confidence, and skill. Rapid qualitative analysis identified barriers and facilitators to applying training skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen generalist physicians participated, with 11 (58%) providing 12-month follow-up data. At 12 months, compared to pre-training, more participants agreed or highly agreed that after the training, they had adequate knowledge (100% vs 44%), confidence (100% vs 44%), and skill (89% vs 44%) in OUD care, but differences were not statistically significant. Self-reported frequency of providing OUD care was unchanged. During qualitative interviews (2 participants) and the focus group (3 participants), participants appreciated the training format but described confidence declining over time. Ongoing barriers to MOUD initiation included challenges with counseling patients about MOUD, discharge planning, accessing OUD care protocols and decision aides, lack of interprofessional collaboration, and time pressures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Generalist physicians reported increases in knowledge, confidence, and skill with OUD training, but a single session was insufficient to maintain confidence and change practice. Additional training sessions emphasizing patient counseling and discharge planning should be developed and evaluated in a larger sample. Simultaneous efforts to address systemic barriers are also needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342251330021"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251330021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitalizations are important opportunities to deliver evidence-based opioid use disorder (OUD) care, yet most hospital-based generalist physicians receive minimal OUD training. We describe a novel OUD training for generalists and mixed-methods evaluation in a large urban hospital.

Methods: Training Description: Hospital-based generalist physicians received a single, 1-hour, small-group, in-person OUD training (OUD diagnosis, initiating medications for OUD [MOUD], and discharge planning) and post-training support. Evaluation: We examined self-reported changes in knowledge, confidence, skill, and frequency of providing OUD care; barriers and facilitators to applying training skills; and suggestions for training modification. Data collection included the following: (1) end-of-training questionnaires; (2) 12-month follow-up questionnaires (retrospective pre-post-design); and (3) qualitative interviews and a focus group. Stuart Maxwell tests were used to examine pre-/post-differences in knowledge, confidence, and skill. Rapid qualitative analysis identified barriers and facilitators to applying training skills.

Results: Nineteen generalist physicians participated, with 11 (58%) providing 12-month follow-up data. At 12 months, compared to pre-training, more participants agreed or highly agreed that after the training, they had adequate knowledge (100% vs 44%), confidence (100% vs 44%), and skill (89% vs 44%) in OUD care, but differences were not statistically significant. Self-reported frequency of providing OUD care was unchanged. During qualitative interviews (2 participants) and the focus group (3 participants), participants appreciated the training format but described confidence declining over time. Ongoing barriers to MOUD initiation included challenges with counseling patients about MOUD, discharge planning, accessing OUD care protocols and decision aides, lack of interprofessional collaboration, and time pressures.

Conclusion: Generalist physicians reported increases in knowledge, confidence, and skill with OUD training, but a single session was insufficient to maintain confidence and change practice. Additional training sessions emphasizing patient counseling and discharge planning should be developed and evaluated in a larger sample. Simultaneous efforts to address systemic barriers are also needed.

对医院全科医生进行的基于实践的 OUD 护理培训的描述和评估。
背景:住院是提供基于证据的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)护理的重要机会,但大多数医院的全科医生接受的OUD培训很少。我们描述了一个大型城市医院对全科医生的新型OUD培训和混合方法评估。培训描述:以医院为基础的全科医生接受了单次、1小时、小组、现场的OUD培训(OUD诊断、开始使用OUD药物和出院计划)和培训后支持。评估:我们检查了自我报告的知识、信心、技能和提供OUD护理频率的变化;应用培训技能的障碍和促进因素;培训修改建议。数据收集包括:(1)培训结束问卷;(2) 12个月随访问卷(回顾性前后设计);(3)定性访谈和焦点小组。斯图尔特麦克斯韦尔测试用于检查知识,信心和技能的前后差异。快速定性分析确定了应用培训技能的障碍和促进因素。结果:19名全科医生参与其中,11名(58%)提供了12个月的随访数据。在12个月时,与训练前相比,更多的参与者同意或高度同意训练后他们对OUD护理有足够的知识(100%对44%),信心(100%对44%)和技能(89%对44%),但差异无统计学意义。自我报告提供OUD护理的频率没有变化。在定性访谈(2名参与者)和焦点小组(3名参与者)中,参与者对培训形式表示赞赏,但表示信心随着时间的推移而下降。启动OUD的持续障碍包括向患者提供关于OUD的咨询、出院计划、获取OUD护理协议和决策助手、缺乏跨专业合作和时间压力方面的挑战。结论:全科医生报告说,通过OUD培训,他们的知识、信心和技能都有所提高,但单次培训不足以保持信心和改变实践。应该在更大的样本中开发和评估强调患者咨询和出院计划的额外培训课程。同时还需要努力解决系统性障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信