Symptomatic joint hypermobility is not a barrier to attendance, graduation, or satisfaction for adults participating in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2025.1472160
Lindsay G Flegge, Emma Estrella, Elizabeth K Harris, Adam T Hirsh, Michael A Bushey
{"title":"Symptomatic joint hypermobility is not a barrier to attendance, graduation, or satisfaction for adults participating in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program.","authors":"Lindsay G Flegge, Emma Estrella, Elizabeth K Harris, Adam T Hirsh, Michael A Bushey","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1472160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Symptomatic joint hypermobility, as found in conditions like hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS), presents unique challenges in pain management due to associated symptoms such as chronic pain, joint instability, and dysautonomia. Despite the high prevalence of hypermobility and associated healthcare costs, there is a lack of research on effective treatments for these patients, particularly in the context of multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the baseline characteristics, attendance, graduation rates, and patient satisfaction of hypermobile and non-hypermobile adult outpatients participating in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (PRP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from 335 patients at the Indiana University Health Pain Navigation Service between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Baseline characteristics were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures, and attendance and graduation rates were tracked. Hypermobile and non-hypermobile groups were compared with independent samples t-tests and chi-squared tests. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess the impact of hypermobility diagnosis on PRP attendance, with pertinent demographic and baseline clinical scores entered as covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypermobile patients differed significantly from non-hypermobile patients in demographics, including age, gender, race, education, and employment status. Despite these differences, hypermobile patients did not differ from non-hypermobile patients in PRP attendance or graduation rates. Baseline pain, depression, and pain catastrophizing scores were lower in the hypermobile group. Exit surveys indicated similar levels of overall satisfaction with the program, though hypermobile patients were less likely to report that their needs were fully met than were non-hypermobile patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite the potential for joint hypermobility to pose a barrier to participation in multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs, we found no evidence that patients with a hypermobile diagnosis had less participation in an intensive outpatient pain rehabilitation program. After accounting for group differences in key demographic and clinical variables, there were no significant differences in PRP attendance between hypermobile and non-hypermobile patients. Our results are encouraging regarding the potential for multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs to serve the needs of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1472160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1472160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Symptomatic joint hypermobility, as found in conditions like hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS), presents unique challenges in pain management due to associated symptoms such as chronic pain, joint instability, and dysautonomia. Despite the high prevalence of hypermobility and associated healthcare costs, there is a lack of research on effective treatments for these patients, particularly in the context of multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs.

Objective: This study aims to compare the baseline characteristics, attendance, graduation rates, and patient satisfaction of hypermobile and non-hypermobile adult outpatients participating in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (PRP).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from 335 patients at the Indiana University Health Pain Navigation Service between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Baseline characteristics were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures, and attendance and graduation rates were tracked. Hypermobile and non-hypermobile groups were compared with independent samples t-tests and chi-squared tests. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess the impact of hypermobility diagnosis on PRP attendance, with pertinent demographic and baseline clinical scores entered as covariates.

Results: Hypermobile patients differed significantly from non-hypermobile patients in demographics, including age, gender, race, education, and employment status. Despite these differences, hypermobile patients did not differ from non-hypermobile patients in PRP attendance or graduation rates. Baseline pain, depression, and pain catastrophizing scores were lower in the hypermobile group. Exit surveys indicated similar levels of overall satisfaction with the program, though hypermobile patients were less likely to report that their needs were fully met than were non-hypermobile patients.

Discussion: Despite the potential for joint hypermobility to pose a barrier to participation in multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs, we found no evidence that patients with a hypermobile diagnosis had less participation in an intensive outpatient pain rehabilitation program. After accounting for group differences in key demographic and clinical variables, there were no significant differences in PRP attendance between hypermobile and non-hypermobile patients. Our results are encouraging regarding the potential for multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs to serve the needs of these patients.

对于参加多学科疼痛康复计划的成年人来说,症状性关节过度活动不是出勤、毕业或满意的障碍。
症状性关节过度活动,如过度活动Ehlers-Danlos综合征(hEDS),由于相关症状,如慢性疼痛、关节不稳定和自主神经异常,在疼痛管理方面提出了独特的挑战。尽管多动症的患病率很高,相关的医疗费用也很高,但缺乏对这些患者有效治疗的研究,特别是在多学科疼痛康复计划的背景下。目的:本研究旨在比较参与多学科疼痛康复计划(PRP)的多运动和非多运动成人门诊患者的基线特征、出勤率、毕业率和患者满意度。方法:这项回顾性队列研究分析了印第安纳大学健康疼痛导航服务中心2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间335名患者的临床数据。使用患者报告的结果测量方法评估基线特征,并跟踪出勤率和毕业率。超移动组和非超移动组比较独立样本t检验和卡方检验。使用多元线性回归模型评估多动诊断对PRP出勤率的影响,相关的人口统计学和基线临床评分作为协变量输入。结果:活动过度患者与非活动过度患者在人口统计学上存在显著差异,包括年龄、性别、种族、教育程度和就业状况。尽管存在这些差异,但在PRP出勤率或毕业率方面,多动症患者与非多动症患者并无差异。运动过度组的基线疼痛、抑郁和疼痛灾难得分较低。出院后的调查表明,对该计划的总体满意度水平相似,尽管行动过度的患者比非行动过度的患者更不可能报告他们的需求得到了充分满足。讨论:尽管关节活动过度可能成为参与多学科疼痛康复计划的障碍,但我们没有发现任何证据表明诊断为活动过度的患者较少参与强化门诊疼痛康复计划。在考虑了关键人口统计学和临床变量的组差异后,多动和非多动患者的PRP出席率没有显著差异。我们的结果是令人鼓舞的关于潜在的多学科疼痛康复方案,以满足这些患者的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信