Self-Efficacy is a Stronger Predictor of Final Grade Than Motivation in an Introductory Biology Course: A Structural Equation Analysis.

IF 4.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Bailey Von der Mehden, Laurel Philpott, Elisabeth E Schussler
{"title":"Self-Efficacy is a Stronger Predictor of Final Grade Than Motivation in an Introductory Biology Course: A Structural Equation Analysis.","authors":"Bailey Von der Mehden, Laurel Philpott, Elisabeth E Schussler","doi":"10.1187/cbe.24-09-0233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Student self-efficacy, their confidence to successfully perform a task, is positively related to course performance. Students with high self-efficacy for a task are more motivated toward that task. Yet few studies have measured students' self-efficacy and motivation levels after exams are returned in introductory biology classes or studied how these levels relate to final course grades. To address these questions, we used structural equation modeling to examine how introductory biology students' (<i>n</i> = 123) self-efficacy and motivation scores at the beginning of the semester and after the first two course assessments related to their final course grades. Both self-efficacy and intrinsic goal orientation-motivated by a desire to learn or gain new skills-decreased after the first assessment grades were returned to the students. We found positive relationships between self-efficacy and motivation, and between self-efficacy and final course grades, across all timepoints. Motivation scores were not associated with final course grades, but the relationship between self-efficacy levels and final grades was significant and became stronger at each timepoint. These results suggest the importance of supporting self-efficacy development after early assessments, a time when students are particularly vulnerable to declines in confidence and motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56321,"journal":{"name":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","volume":"24 2","pages":"ar21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-09-0233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Student self-efficacy, their confidence to successfully perform a task, is positively related to course performance. Students with high self-efficacy for a task are more motivated toward that task. Yet few studies have measured students' self-efficacy and motivation levels after exams are returned in introductory biology classes or studied how these levels relate to final course grades. To address these questions, we used structural equation modeling to examine how introductory biology students' (n = 123) self-efficacy and motivation scores at the beginning of the semester and after the first two course assessments related to their final course grades. Both self-efficacy and intrinsic goal orientation-motivated by a desire to learn or gain new skills-decreased after the first assessment grades were returned to the students. We found positive relationships between self-efficacy and motivation, and between self-efficacy and final course grades, across all timepoints. Motivation scores were not associated with final course grades, but the relationship between self-efficacy levels and final grades was significant and became stronger at each timepoint. These results suggest the importance of supporting self-efficacy development after early assessments, a time when students are particularly vulnerable to declines in confidence and motivation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生物导论课程中自我效能比动机更能预测期末成绩:结构方程分析。
学生自我效能感,即成功完成任务的信心,与课程成绩正相关。对一项任务自我效能感高的学生更有动力去完成这项任务。然而,很少有研究测量学生在生物学入门课考试后的自我效能感和动力水平,或者研究这些水平与最终课程成绩的关系。为了解决这些问题,我们使用结构方程模型来检查入门生物学学生(n = 123)在学期开始和前两次课程评估后的自我效能感和动机分数与他们最终课程成绩的关系。自我效能感和内在目标导向(由学习或获得新技能的愿望驱动)在第一次评估成绩返回给学生后都有所下降。我们发现,在所有时间点,自我效能感和动机之间,以及自我效能感和期末成绩之间存在正相关关系。动机得分与最终课程成绩无关,但自我效能水平与最终成绩之间的关系显著,并且在每个时间点上变得更强。这些结果表明,在早期评估后支持自我效能感发展的重要性,在这个时期,学生特别容易受到信心和动力下降的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cbe-Life Sciences Education
Cbe-Life Sciences Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
13.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CBE—Life Sciences Education (LSE), a free, online quarterly journal, is published by the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). The journal was launched in spring 2002 as Cell Biology Education—A Journal of Life Science Education. The ASCB changed the name of the journal in spring 2006 to better reflect the breadth of its readership and the scope of its submissions. LSE publishes peer-reviewed articles on life science education at the K–12, undergraduate, and graduate levels. The ASCB believes that learning in biology encompasses diverse fields, including math, chemistry, physics, engineering, computer science, and the interdisciplinary intersections of biology with these fields. Within biology, LSE focuses on how students are introduced to the study of life sciences, as well as approaches in cell biology, developmental biology, neuroscience, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, genomics, bioinformatics, and proteomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信