Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty with Orbital Fat Repositioning versus Fat Grafting for Tear Trough Deformity: A Prospective, Comparative and Randomized Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Jingni Li, Ting Xie, Xintong Jiang, Minli Yang, Beilei Wang, Hengxin Liu
{"title":"Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty with Orbital Fat Repositioning versus Fat Grafting for Tear Trough Deformity: A Prospective, Comparative and Randomized Study.","authors":"Jingni Li, Ting Xie, Xintong Jiang, Minli Yang, Beilei Wang, Hengxin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fat prolapse and tear trough deformity, indicative of lower eyelid aging, are increasingly prevalent in younger patients. Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty (TCLB) is a suitable treatment for this demographic; however, traditional techniques have limitations that affect their simplicity and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to systematically compare the modified TCLB technique with traditional TCLB in two groups, with the aim of evaluating its therapeutic efficacy through direct methodological comparison.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study, conducted from August 2020 to August 2022, included 40 patients with lower eyelid fat prolapse and tear trough deformity, randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. The experimental group underwent a modified TCLB technique, while the control group received traditional TCLB combined with orbital fat release. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated by comparing baseline data, surgical duration, changes in the vertical distance from the lowest point of the tear trough to the pupil, Barton tear trough classification, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Preoperative baseline data showed no significant differences between the two groups. However, the experimental group had a significantly shorter surgical duration. Post-treatment comparisons revealed superior maintenance of surgical outcomes in the experimental group compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This prospective, comparative, and randomized study demonstrates the favorable therapeutic effects of the modified TCLB technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fat prolapse and tear trough deformity, indicative of lower eyelid aging, are increasingly prevalent in younger patients. Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty (TCLB) is a suitable treatment for this demographic; however, traditional techniques have limitations that affect their simplicity and effectiveness.

Objective: We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to systematically compare the modified TCLB technique with traditional TCLB in two groups, with the aim of evaluating its therapeutic efficacy through direct methodological comparison.

Method: This study, conducted from August 2020 to August 2022, included 40 patients with lower eyelid fat prolapse and tear trough deformity, randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. The experimental group underwent a modified TCLB technique, while the control group received traditional TCLB combined with orbital fat release. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated by comparing baseline data, surgical duration, changes in the vertical distance from the lowest point of the tear trough to the pupil, Barton tear trough classification, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) between the two groups.

Result: Preoperative baseline data showed no significant differences between the two groups. However, the experimental group had a significantly shorter surgical duration. Post-treatment comparisons revealed superior maintenance of surgical outcomes in the experimental group compared to the control group.

Conclusion: This prospective, comparative, and randomized study demonstrates the favorable therapeutic effects of the modified TCLB technique.

经结膜下睑成形术联合眶脂肪复位与脂肪移植术治疗泪槽畸形:一项前瞻性、对比性和随机研究。
背景:脂肪脱垂和撕裂畸形,表明下眼睑老化,在年轻患者中越来越普遍。经结膜下睑成形术(TCLB)是适合这一人群的治疗方法;然而,传统技术有局限性,影响了它们的简单性和有效性。目的:我们进行前瞻性、随机对照试验,系统比较两组改良TCLB技术与传统TCLB技术,通过直接方法学比较,评价其治疗效果。方法:本研究于2020年8月至2022年8月进行,选取40例下眼睑脂肪脱垂和撕裂槽畸形患者,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组采用改良TCLB技术,对照组采用传统TCLB联合眼眶脂肪释放。通过比较两组的基线数据、手术时间、泪槽最低点到瞳孔的垂直距离变化、Barton泪槽分类和全球审美改善量表(GAIS)来评估术后结果。结果:两组术前基线数据无显著差异。实验组的手术时间明显缩短。治疗后比较显示实验组比对照组在手术结果的维持上更胜一筹。结论:这项前瞻性、对比性、随机化的研究证明了改良TCLB技术的良好治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信