Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty with Orbital Fat Repositioning versus Fat Grafting for Tear Trough Deformity: A Prospective, Comparative and Randomized Study.
{"title":"Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty with Orbital Fat Repositioning versus Fat Grafting for Tear Trough Deformity: A Prospective, Comparative and Randomized Study.","authors":"Jingni Li, Ting Xie, Xintong Jiang, Minli Yang, Beilei Wang, Hengxin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fat prolapse and tear trough deformity, indicative of lower eyelid aging, are increasingly prevalent in younger patients. Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty (TCLB) is a suitable treatment for this demographic; however, traditional techniques have limitations that affect their simplicity and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to systematically compare the modified TCLB technique with traditional TCLB in two groups, with the aim of evaluating its therapeutic efficacy through direct methodological comparison.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study, conducted from August 2020 to August 2022, included 40 patients with lower eyelid fat prolapse and tear trough deformity, randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. The experimental group underwent a modified TCLB technique, while the control group received traditional TCLB combined with orbital fat release. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated by comparing baseline data, surgical duration, changes in the vertical distance from the lowest point of the tear trough to the pupil, Barton tear trough classification, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Preoperative baseline data showed no significant differences between the two groups. However, the experimental group had a significantly shorter surgical duration. Post-treatment comparisons revealed superior maintenance of surgical outcomes in the experimental group compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This prospective, comparative, and randomized study demonstrates the favorable therapeutic effects of the modified TCLB technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fat prolapse and tear trough deformity, indicative of lower eyelid aging, are increasingly prevalent in younger patients. Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty (TCLB) is a suitable treatment for this demographic; however, traditional techniques have limitations that affect their simplicity and effectiveness.
Objective: We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to systematically compare the modified TCLB technique with traditional TCLB in two groups, with the aim of evaluating its therapeutic efficacy through direct methodological comparison.
Method: This study, conducted from August 2020 to August 2022, included 40 patients with lower eyelid fat prolapse and tear trough deformity, randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. The experimental group underwent a modified TCLB technique, while the control group received traditional TCLB combined with orbital fat release. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated by comparing baseline data, surgical duration, changes in the vertical distance from the lowest point of the tear trough to the pupil, Barton tear trough classification, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) between the two groups.
Result: Preoperative baseline data showed no significant differences between the two groups. However, the experimental group had a significantly shorter surgical duration. Post-treatment comparisons revealed superior maintenance of surgical outcomes in the experimental group compared to the control group.
Conclusion: This prospective, comparative, and randomized study demonstrates the favorable therapeutic effects of the modified TCLB technique.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.