Assistive technology in brain injury rehabilitation: A survey scoping clinician frequency and type of assistive technology use.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Kavya Pilli, Brendan Worne, Lauren J Christie, Grahame K Simpson
{"title":"Assistive technology in brain injury rehabilitation: A survey scoping clinician frequency and type of assistive technology use.","authors":"Kavya Pilli, Brendan Worne, Lauren J Christie, Grahame K Simpson","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2475544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>The benefits of assistive technology (AT) have been well established to positively support participation within disability. Clinicians have an important role in guiding clients to choose goal-centred AT. This study aims to explore (i) the frequency and types of AT prescribed by clinicians and (ii) real-world implementation of AT by clinicians, employing the ISO 9999 framework, and the challenges involved with AT prescription. An online survey was circulated to brain injury clinicians within New South Wales (NSW). Data were exported into IBM SPSS Statistics v.27 for analysis. Free text responses were analysed using a mixed-methods content analysis. A total of 31 AT products were reported 131 times by clinicians. The most frequently reported AT category was mainstream technology (<i>n</i> = 81), used amongst all professions. Using the ISO 9999 framework, the most reported class use of AT was \"communication and information management\" (<i>n</i> = 77/131). Challenges around AT implementation were funding acquisition, customizability of AT and time constraints with training. NSW clinicians have demonstrated varied use of AT to support cognitive, physical and communication functions. However, with the rapidly advancing nature of AT, there needs to be quicker approaches to generate high-quality evidence to support its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2475544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe benefits of assistive technology (AT) have been well established to positively support participation within disability. Clinicians have an important role in guiding clients to choose goal-centred AT. This study aims to explore (i) the frequency and types of AT prescribed by clinicians and (ii) real-world implementation of AT by clinicians, employing the ISO 9999 framework, and the challenges involved with AT prescription. An online survey was circulated to brain injury clinicians within New South Wales (NSW). Data were exported into IBM SPSS Statistics v.27 for analysis. Free text responses were analysed using a mixed-methods content analysis. A total of 31 AT products were reported 131 times by clinicians. The most frequently reported AT category was mainstream technology (n = 81), used amongst all professions. Using the ISO 9999 framework, the most reported class use of AT was "communication and information management" (n = 77/131). Challenges around AT implementation were funding acquisition, customizability of AT and time constraints with training. NSW clinicians have demonstrated varied use of AT to support cognitive, physical and communication functions. However, with the rapidly advancing nature of AT, there needs to be quicker approaches to generate high-quality evidence to support its use.

脑损伤康复中的辅助技术:临床医生使用辅助技术的频率和类型的调查。
摘要辅助技术(AT)的好处已经被很好地确立为积极支持残疾人参与。临床医生在指导客户选择以目标为中心的AT方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在探讨(i)临床医生开AT处方的频率和类型,(ii)临床医生使用ISO 9999框架在现实世界中实施AT,以及AT处方所涉及的挑战。一份在线调查被分发给新南威尔士州(NSW)的脑损伤临床医生。数据导出到IBM SPSS Statistics v.27中进行分析。使用混合方法内容分析分析自由文本回复。临床医生共报告31种AT产品131次。最常报告的AT类别是主流技术(n = 81),在所有职业中使用。使用ISO 9999框架,报告使用AT最多的班级是“通信和信息管理”(n = 77/131)。围绕AT实施的挑战是资金获取、AT的可定制性和培训的时间限制。新南威尔士州的临床医生已经证明了多种使用AT来支持认知、身体和沟通功能。然而,随着自动诊断技术的迅速发展,需要有更快的方法来产生高质量的证据来支持其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信