A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Reporting NCLEX Pass Rates by Nursing Program in the United States.

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Elizabeth R Eisenhauer
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Reporting NCLEX Pass Rates by Nursing Program in the United States.","authors":"Elizabeth R Eisenhauer","doi":"10.1177/15271544251326944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While many metrics may be used to assess the quality of U.S. prelicensure nursing programs, one commonly accepted metric is the student pass rate on the National Council Licensure Exam (NCLEX). NCLEX pass rates are increasingly being used in research projects, and it is critical to have consistent and complete data for such projects. These data are also important to the public for informed decision-making. In the age of open science and data sharing, there is no reason that these data should not be readily available and consistently reported to the public. The aim of this study was to determine how many, and which, state boards of nursing (BONs) publicly report NCLEX pass rates by nursing program. A descriptive, cross-sectional study design was used to examine each state BON website for NCELX pass rate data by program. Initial results indicated that 47 states and the District of Columbia reported NCLEX pass rate data by nursing program through their BON website. At the outset of this study, Alaska, Michigan, and Vermont did not report NCELX pass rate data by program. Michigan posted four years (2021-2024) of NCLEX pass rates by nursing program in February 2025. Amounts and types of data reported were reported inconsistently across states. NCLEX pass rate data by program should be transparently and consistently reported, in a standardized format by all states to facilitate nursing research, equitably inform the public, and increase trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":53177,"journal":{"name":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15271544251326944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544251326944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While many metrics may be used to assess the quality of U.S. prelicensure nursing programs, one commonly accepted metric is the student pass rate on the National Council Licensure Exam (NCLEX). NCLEX pass rates are increasingly being used in research projects, and it is critical to have consistent and complete data for such projects. These data are also important to the public for informed decision-making. In the age of open science and data sharing, there is no reason that these data should not be readily available and consistently reported to the public. The aim of this study was to determine how many, and which, state boards of nursing (BONs) publicly report NCLEX pass rates by nursing program. A descriptive, cross-sectional study design was used to examine each state BON website for NCELX pass rate data by program. Initial results indicated that 47 states and the District of Columbia reported NCLEX pass rate data by nursing program through their BON website. At the outset of this study, Alaska, Michigan, and Vermont did not report NCELX pass rate data by program. Michigan posted four years (2021-2024) of NCLEX pass rates by nursing program in February 2025. Amounts and types of data reported were reported inconsistently across states. NCLEX pass rate data by program should be transparently and consistently reported, in a standardized format by all states to facilitate nursing research, equitably inform the public, and increase trust.

美国护理项目报告NCLEX通过率的横断面分析。
虽然有许多指标可以用来评估美国护理执照预备课程的质量,但一个普遍接受的指标是学生在全国委员会执照考试(NCLEX)中的通过率。NCLEX通过率越来越多地用于研究项目,对于这些项目来说,拥有一致和完整的数据至关重要。这些数据对公众的知情决策也很重要。在开放科学和数据共享的时代,没有理由不让这些数据随时可用并持续向公众报告。本研究的目的是确定有多少州护理委员会(BONs)通过护理项目公开报告NCLEX的通过率。采用描述性横断面研究设计,按程序检查各州BON网站的NCELX通过率数据。初步结果表明,47个州和哥伦比亚特区通过其BON网站通过护理项目报告了NCLEX的通过率数据。在本研究开始时,阿拉斯加州、密歇根州和佛蒙特州没有按项目报告NCELX的通过率数据。密歇根州在2025年2月公布了四年(2021-2024年)护理项目的NCLEX通过率。各州报告的数据数量和类型不一致。各项目的NCLEX通过率数据应透明和一致地报告,由所有州以标准化格式进行报告,以促进护理研究,公平地告知公众,并增加信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that explores the multiple relationships between nursing and health policy. It serves as a major source of data-based study, policy analysis and discussion on timely, relevant policy issues for nurses in a broad variety of roles and settings, and for others outside of nursing who are interested in nursing-related policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信