Assessment of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) response times and operational factors in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA): a retrospective analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.5114/aic.2024.145345
Mariusz Goniewicz, Kamil Bednarz, Ahmed M Al-Wathinani, Krzysztof Goniewicz
{"title":"Assessment of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) response times and operational factors in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA): a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Mariusz Goniewicz, Kamil Bednarz, Ahmed M Al-Wathinani, Krzysztof Goniewicz","doi":"10.5114/aic.2024.145345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) require rapid emergency medical service (EMS) responses to improve patient outcomes. This study examines non-patient factors affecting EMS response times and OHCA outcomes, particularly return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), with a focus on factors such as location, time of day, and season.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the influence of operational and situational factors on EMS response times and their association with ROSC rates.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed using EMS records from the Lublin Voivodeship, Poland, covering 2014 to 2017. A total of 4,361 OHCA cases were selected from an initial 5,111 identified cases through ICD-10 and ICD-9 codes, utilizing call-out cards and medical rescue activity cards. Statistical analyses, including χ<sup>2</sup> tests and correlation coefficients, assessed the impact of socio-demographic and operational factors on ROSC outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shorter EMS response times were significantly associated with higher ROSC rates, with a mean response time of 7.92 min for ROSC cases (SD = 4.86) versus 8.29 min for non-ROSC cases (SD = 4.19; <i>p</i> = 0.0430). High-priority cases (K-1) had better ROSC outcomes (16.97%) compared to lower-priority cases (K-2: 12.30%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Time of day and season did not significantly impact response effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapid EMS response and effective prioritization improve ROSC rates in OHCA incidents. The findings highlight the need to optimize EMS protocols and training, with targeted strategies that consider operational factors to enhance survival rates across varied populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49678,"journal":{"name":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","volume":"21 1","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.145345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) require rapid emergency medical service (EMS) responses to improve patient outcomes. This study examines non-patient factors affecting EMS response times and OHCA outcomes, particularly return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), with a focus on factors such as location, time of day, and season.

Aim: To evaluate the influence of operational and situational factors on EMS response times and their association with ROSC rates.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using EMS records from the Lublin Voivodeship, Poland, covering 2014 to 2017. A total of 4,361 OHCA cases were selected from an initial 5,111 identified cases through ICD-10 and ICD-9 codes, utilizing call-out cards and medical rescue activity cards. Statistical analyses, including χ2 tests and correlation coefficients, assessed the impact of socio-demographic and operational factors on ROSC outcomes.

Results: Shorter EMS response times were significantly associated with higher ROSC rates, with a mean response time of 7.92 min for ROSC cases (SD = 4.86) versus 8.29 min for non-ROSC cases (SD = 4.19; p = 0.0430). High-priority cases (K-1) had better ROSC outcomes (16.97%) compared to lower-priority cases (K-2: 12.30%; p < 0.05). Time of day and season did not significantly impact response effectiveness.

Conclusions: Rapid EMS response and effective prioritization improve ROSC rates in OHCA incidents. The findings highlight the need to optimize EMS protocols and training, with targeted strategies that consider operational factors to enhance survival rates across varied populations.

院外心脏骤停(OHCA)急诊医疗服务(EMS)响应时间和操作因素评估:回顾性分析
院外心脏骤停(ohca)需要快速的紧急医疗服务(EMS)响应来改善患者的预后。本研究探讨了影响EMS反应时间和OHCA结果的非患者因素,特别是自发循环恢复(ROSC),重点关注地点、时间和季节等因素。目的:评价操作因素和情境因素对急救反应时间的影响及其与ROSC率的关系。材料和方法:对2014年至2017年波兰卢布林省的EMS记录进行回顾性分析。通过ICD-10和ICD-9代码,利用呼叫卡和医疗救援活动卡,从最初确定的5 111例OHCA病例中选出了4 361例OHCA病例。统计分析,包括χ2检验和相关系数,评估了社会人口因素和操作因素对ROSC结果的影响。结果:较短的EMS反应时间与较高的ROSC发生率显著相关,ROSC病例的平均反应时间为7.92 min (SD = 4.86),而非ROSC病例的平均反应时间为8.29 min (SD = 4.19;P = 0.0430)。高优先级病例(K-1)的ROSC预后(16.97%)优于低优先级病例(K-2: 12.30%;P < 0.05)。一天中的时间和季节对反应效果没有显著影响。结论:快速的EMS响应和有效的优先排序可提高OHCA事件的ROSC率。研究结果强调了优化EMS协议和培训的必要性,以及考虑操作因素的有针对性的策略,以提高不同人群的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology is indexed in: Index Copernicus, Ministry of Science and Higher Education Index (MNiSW). Advances in Interventional Cardiology is a quarterly aimed at specialists, mainly at cardiologists and cardiosurgeons. Official journal of the Association on Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信