Relationship between Range of Motion and Isometric Shoulder Strength in Elite Team Handball Players.

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.133546
Tina Piil Torabi, Jesper Bencke, Roland van den Tillaar
{"title":"Relationship between Range of Motion and Isometric Shoulder Strength in Elite Team Handball Players.","authors":"Tina Piil Torabi, Jesper Bencke, Roland van den Tillaar","doi":"10.26603/001c.133546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of overuse shoulder injuries is unfortunately common in team handball, potentially impacting sport participation and quality of life after players' professional careers. Shoulder rotational strength and glenohumeral range of motion have been proposed to influence the development of shoulder injuries.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare external and internal shoulder rotation range of motion and isometric strength among elite male and female handball players with current shoulder pain, previous shoulder pain, and no shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An explorative cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Maximal isometric shoulder internal and external rotator strength and shoulder internal and external rotation range of motion were measured and compared between sexes and among players with current shoulder pain, previous shoulder pain, and no shoulder pain. All data distributions were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test, histograms, and qq plots. An ANOVA was used to compare the internal and external shoulder range of motion and strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 elite team handball players, 57 women (1.74±0.06 m, 72.4 ± 8.3 kg, and 22.4±4.9 years) and 79 men (1.89±0.08 m, 90.8 ± 11.8 kg, and 22.3 ± 5.2 years) participated. A significant difference in maximal internal (p<0.001) and external (p=0.004) shoulder rotator strength was found between sexes, with no significant difference in range of motion. When categorized by groups, male athletes in the no-pain group had greater internal rotator strength than males in the current and previous pain groups (p<0.042). Furthermore, female athletes in the no-pain group showed significantly less internal and external rotation range of motion compared to those playing with shoulder pain and those with previous pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater maximal isometric shoulder strength was found for men than women, primarily of the internal rotators, among all three groups. However, the men in the no-pain group had greater strength of the internal rotators than the two other groups. Range of motion was comparable between sexes, but the women without shoulder pain demonstrated significantly less internal and external rotation range of motion compared to those playing with shoulder pain and those with previous pain.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 4","pages":"522-531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.133546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of overuse shoulder injuries is unfortunately common in team handball, potentially impacting sport participation and quality of life after players' professional careers. Shoulder rotational strength and glenohumeral range of motion have been proposed to influence the development of shoulder injuries.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare external and internal shoulder rotation range of motion and isometric strength among elite male and female handball players with current shoulder pain, previous shoulder pain, and no shoulder pain.

Study design: An explorative cross-sectional study.

Methods: Maximal isometric shoulder internal and external rotator strength and shoulder internal and external rotation range of motion were measured and compared between sexes and among players with current shoulder pain, previous shoulder pain, and no shoulder pain. All data distributions were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test, histograms, and qq plots. An ANOVA was used to compare the internal and external shoulder range of motion and strength.

Results: A total of 136 elite team handball players, 57 women (1.74±0.06 m, 72.4 ± 8.3 kg, and 22.4±4.9 years) and 79 men (1.89±0.08 m, 90.8 ± 11.8 kg, and 22.3 ± 5.2 years) participated. A significant difference in maximal internal (p<0.001) and external (p=0.004) shoulder rotator strength was found between sexes, with no significant difference in range of motion. When categorized by groups, male athletes in the no-pain group had greater internal rotator strength than males in the current and previous pain groups (p<0.042). Furthermore, female athletes in the no-pain group showed significantly less internal and external rotation range of motion compared to those playing with shoulder pain and those with previous pain.

Conclusion: Greater maximal isometric shoulder strength was found for men than women, primarily of the internal rotators, among all three groups. However, the men in the no-pain group had greater strength of the internal rotators than the two other groups. Range of motion was comparable between sexes, but the women without shoulder pain demonstrated significantly less internal and external rotation range of motion compared to those playing with shoulder pain and those with previous pain.

Level of evidence: 3.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信