Assessing the psychological distress and coping strategies among academic staff of a university during COVID-19.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health SA Gesondheid Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2752
Isaiah Owoeye, Toluwani Agunbiade, Adebanke Agboola, Oluwafemi Sanya, Babatope Adebiyi, Furaha Akimanimpaye
{"title":"Assessing the psychological distress and coping strategies among academic staff of a university during COVID-19.","authors":"Isaiah Owoeye, Toluwani Agunbiade, Adebanke Agboola, Oluwafemi Sanya, Babatope Adebiyi, Furaha Akimanimpaye","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with stress because of its disruption to normal lifestyle. While the resilience of people was challenged, some coping strategies were adopted to maintain balance in the face of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess psychological distress and coping strategies among the academic staff.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Afe Babalola University located in the Southwest, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive-cross-sectional design was used on the population of 512 academics where a sample size of 248 was drawn using Taro Yamane with a 10% non-response rate. The instruments used were a modified Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and an adapted COPE inventory for coping strategies. The scale reliability of K10 was 0.866 while that of coping strategy was 0.610. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28. The results were presented in simple percentages, means and standard deviations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents had severe psychological distress (185, 98.9%) with the most rated report 'Feel worthless' 4.8 ± 0.59. The most rated coping strategy was 'I try to lose myself for a while by drinking alcohol or taking drugs'3.8 ± 0.60 with overall coping scale mean, 2.3 ± 1.02.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was severe distress and substance used among academics. The study recommends teaching on effective coping styles and institution probable preparation for future pandemic.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study provides insight into the psychological state of the academic staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and unveils the adaptive strategies used. The results of the study are useful for the development of appropriate coping skills for the staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":"30 ","pages":"2752"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with stress because of its disruption to normal lifestyle. While the resilience of people was challenged, some coping strategies were adopted to maintain balance in the face of the pandemic.

Aim: To assess psychological distress and coping strategies among the academic staff.

Setting: Afe Babalola University located in the Southwest, Nigeria.

Methods: A descriptive-cross-sectional design was used on the population of 512 academics where a sample size of 248 was drawn using Taro Yamane with a 10% non-response rate. The instruments used were a modified Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and an adapted COPE inventory for coping strategies. The scale reliability of K10 was 0.866 while that of coping strategy was 0.610. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28. The results were presented in simple percentages, means and standard deviations.

Results: Most respondents had severe psychological distress (185, 98.9%) with the most rated report 'Feel worthless' 4.8 ± 0.59. The most rated coping strategy was 'I try to lose myself for a while by drinking alcohol or taking drugs'3.8 ± 0.60 with overall coping scale mean, 2.3 ± 1.02.

Conclusion: There was severe distress and substance used among academics. The study recommends teaching on effective coping styles and institution probable preparation for future pandemic.

Contribution: The study provides insight into the psychological state of the academic staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and unveils the adaptive strategies used. The results of the study are useful for the development of appropriate coping skills for the staff.

新冠肺炎期间高校教职工心理困扰及应对策略评估
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行与压力有关,因为它扰乱了正常的生活方式。虽然人们的复原力受到挑战,但采取了一些应对战略,以在大流行病面前保持平衡。目的:了解高校教职员工的心理困扰及应对策略。环境:巴巴罗拉大学位于尼日利亚西南部。方法:采用描述性横断面设计对512名学者进行调查,其中248人采用Taro Yamane法抽取,无应答率为10%。使用的工具是改良的Kessler心理困扰量表(K10)和适应的COPE应对策略量表。K10量表信度为0.866,应对策略量表信度为0.610。数据分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本28进行。结果以简单的百分比、平均值和标准差表示。结果:大多数被调查者有严重的心理困扰(185人,98.9%),其中“感觉自己毫无价值”(4.8±0.59分)得分最高。得分最高的应对策略是“我试图通过饮酒或吸毒来暂时迷失自我”(3.8±0.60),总体应对量表平均值为2.3±1.02。结论:大学生存在严重的心理压力和药物滥用现象。该研究建议开展有效应对方式的教学,并为未来的大流行做好可能的准备。贡献:本研究揭示了新冠肺炎大流行期间学术人员的心理状态,揭示了所采用的适应策略。研究结果有助于员工发展适当的应对技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信