A cross-sectional study on patient-centered care in a selected hospital in eThekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health SA Gesondheid Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2913
Marcel Peruma, Waheedha Emmamally, Mildred Mooi, Uchenna B Okafor
{"title":"A cross-sectional study on patient-centered care in a selected hospital in eThekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.","authors":"Marcel Peruma, Waheedha Emmamally, Mildred Mooi, Uchenna B Okafor","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical healthcare reform demands high-quality patient care, especially in emergencies. Patient-centred care (PCC) prioritises therapy based on health, characteristics, and needs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examines critical care nurses' views on PCC in a hospital in eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at a selected tertiary care facility in eThekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined 119 conveniently selected critical care nurses from five units treating critically ill adult patients in a central tertiary care hospital in eThekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Personified patient care was measured using the Individualised Care Scale (ICS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values for nurse-supported customised care ranged from 4.27 ± 0.66 to 4.44 ± 0.61. Fear and anxiety during patient discussions have the highest mean score (4.44 ± 0.61). The mean values for four personal life statements were 4.22 ± 0.72 to 4.29 ± 0.65. Hospitalisation experience was surveyed by 90.8% of people, with a mean score of 4.29 ± 0.61. Patients' desire to understand their illness was surveyed by nurses (91.60%) with a mean score of 4.39 ± 6.39. The majority (94.9%) of nurses encouraged patients to express care preferences, whereas 85.8% were inquired about their preferred bathing time. The majority (59.70%) scored average, while 38.70% high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-centred care support was average among critical care nurses. Training and education in critical care should emphasise PCC. To strengthen PCC in clinical practice, execute PCC activities regularly.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study revealed PCC actions and indicated critical care nurses' average support.</p>","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":"30 ","pages":"2913"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical healthcare reform demands high-quality patient care, especially in emergencies. Patient-centred care (PCC) prioritises therapy based on health, characteristics, and needs.

Aim: This study examines critical care nurses' views on PCC in a hospital in eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal.

Setting: The study was conducted at a selected tertiary care facility in eThekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Methods: This cross-sectional study examined 119 conveniently selected critical care nurses from five units treating critically ill adult patients in a central tertiary care hospital in eThekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Personified patient care was measured using the Individualised Care Scale (ICS).

Results: The mean values for nurse-supported customised care ranged from 4.27 ± 0.66 to 4.44 ± 0.61. Fear and anxiety during patient discussions have the highest mean score (4.44 ± 0.61). The mean values for four personal life statements were 4.22 ± 0.72 to 4.29 ± 0.65. Hospitalisation experience was surveyed by 90.8% of people, with a mean score of 4.29 ± 0.61. Patients' desire to understand their illness was surveyed by nurses (91.60%) with a mean score of 4.39 ± 6.39. The majority (94.9%) of nurses encouraged patients to express care preferences, whereas 85.8% were inquired about their preferred bathing time. The majority (59.70%) scored average, while 38.70% high.

Conclusion: Patient-centred care support was average among critical care nurses. Training and education in critical care should emphasise PCC. To strengthen PCC in clinical practice, execute PCC activities regularly.

Contribution: The study revealed PCC actions and indicated critical care nurses' average support.

在南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省eThekwini区一家选定医院进行的以患者为中心的护理横断面研究。
背景:临床医疗改革需要高质量的病人护理,特别是急诊病人。以病人为中心的护理(PCC)优先考虑基于健康、特征和需求的治疗。目的:本研究考察了夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省德班尼市一家医院重症监护护士对PCC的看法。环境:本研究在南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省eThekwini区选定的一家三级医疗机构进行。方法:本横断面研究调查了119名来自南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省eThekwini区一家中央三级医院五个单位的重症监护护士,这些单位负责治疗危重成人患者。个性化患者护理采用个性化护理量表(ICS)进行测量。结果:护士支持定制护理的平均值为4.27±0.66 ~ 4.44±0.61。患者讨论时的恐惧和焦虑得分最高(4.44±0.61)。四项个人生活陈述的平均值为4.22±0.72 ~ 4.29±0.65。90.8%的人对住院经历进行了调查,平均得分为4.29±0.61。护士对患者了解病情意愿的调查占91.60%,平均得分为4.39±6.39。绝大多数(94.9%)护士鼓励患者表达护理偏好,85.8%的护士询问患者偏好的沐浴时间。大多数人(59.70%)得分一般,38.70%得分高。结论:重症监护护士以患者为中心的护理支持水平一般。重症监护的培训和教育应强调PCC。在临床实践中加强PCC,定期开展PCC活动。贡献:该研究揭示了PCC的行动,并指出了重症监护护士的平均支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信