Occupational radiation exposure during blood sample collection post I-131 therapeutic administration in thyroid cancer patients.

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Amna Juma Al-Jabri, Jennie Cooke, Seán Cournane, Marie-Louise Healy
{"title":"Occupational radiation exposure during blood sample collection post I-131 therapeutic administration in thyroid cancer patients.","authors":"Amna Juma Al-Jabri, Jennie Cooke, Seán Cournane, Marie-Louise Healy","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/adc8b3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>&#xD;The blood sampling required for the verification of dose delivered during radioactive iodine (<sup>131</sup>I) therapy is a source of radiation exposure for healthcare staff. This study aims to estimate staff exposures, using Monte Carlo modelling, as well as experimental measurements. The study further aimed to validate the models with staff exposure measurements and examine the impact of protective measures on the procedure.&#xD;Material and methods:&#xD;The clinical set-up of blood sampling post<sup>131</sup>I patient administration, within a dedicated<sup>131</sup>I ablation therapy suite, was modelled using EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). The dose scoring regions representing deep dose (Hp(10)) and skin dose (Hp(0.07)) was estimated, and validated with experimental approach and clinical monitoring of staff members using electronic personal dosimeters (EPD).&#xD;Results:&#xD;Monte Carlo simulations and experimental value did not show significant difference between the two approaches (p>0.05), with simulated values having lower uncertainties. It was demonstrated that the model is capable of being tailored to clinical scenarios at any centre. The simulations were corroborated with dosimetry data of blood sampling from 14 patients post administering 3.7 GBq<sup>131</sup>I, amounting to a total of 54 measurements from 14 staff members. With the employed protective shielding, none of the staff were exposed to a dose rate approaching the annual dose constraint of 0.3 mSv.year<sup>-1</sup>.&#xD;Conclusion:&#xD;The experimental and MCS data showed good agreement with the clinical data, demonstrating the advantages of MCS approaches for providing useful information for planning and carrying out risk assessments before implementing a new dosimetry practice.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/adc8b3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The blood sampling required for the verification of dose delivered during radioactive iodine (131I) therapy is a source of radiation exposure for healthcare staff. This study aims to estimate staff exposures, using Monte Carlo modelling, as well as experimental measurements. The study further aimed to validate the models with staff exposure measurements and examine the impact of protective measures on the procedure. Material and methods: The clinical set-up of blood sampling post131I patient administration, within a dedicated131I ablation therapy suite, was modelled using EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). The dose scoring regions representing deep dose (Hp(10)) and skin dose (Hp(0.07)) was estimated, and validated with experimental approach and clinical monitoring of staff members using electronic personal dosimeters (EPD). Results: Monte Carlo simulations and experimental value did not show significant difference between the two approaches (p>0.05), with simulated values having lower uncertainties. It was demonstrated that the model is capable of being tailored to clinical scenarios at any centre. The simulations were corroborated with dosimetry data of blood sampling from 14 patients post administering 3.7 GBq131I, amounting to a total of 54 measurements from 14 staff members. With the employed protective shielding, none of the staff were exposed to a dose rate approaching the annual dose constraint of 0.3 mSv.year-1. Conclusion: The experimental and MCS data showed good agreement with the clinical data, demonstrating the advantages of MCS approaches for providing useful information for planning and carrying out risk assessments before implementing a new dosimetry practice. .

甲状腺癌患者接受 I-131 治疗后,在采集血液样本过程中受到的职业辐射。
目的:验证放射性碘(131I)治疗期间给予的剂量所需的血液采样是卫生保健人员的辐射暴露源。本研究旨在利用蒙特卡罗模型和实验测量来估计工作人员的暴露。该研究进一步旨在通过工作人员暴露测量来验证模型,并检查防护措施对程序的影响。材料和方法:使用EGSnrc蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)对131i患者给药后血液采样的临床设置进行建模,在专用的131i消融治疗套件中。估计了代表深部剂量(Hp(10))和皮肤剂量(Hp(0.07))的剂量评分区域,并通过实验方法和工作人员使用电子个人剂量计(EPD)的临床监测进行了验证。结果:蒙特卡罗模拟和实验值在两种方法之间没有显着差异(p>0.05),模拟值具有较低的不确定性。实验证明,该模型能够适应任何中心的临床情况。模拟与14名患者在给予3.7 GBq131I后的血液采样剂量学数据相证实,14名工作人员共进行了54次测量。在采用防护屏蔽的情况下,没有任何工作人员受到接近0.3 msv年剂量限制的剂量率。结论:实验和MCS数据与临床数据吻合良好,显示了MCS方法在实施新的剂量学实践之前为规划和开展风险评估提供有用信息的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信