Helena Fernández-Lago, Carolina Climent-Sanz, Maria Masbernat-Almenara, Pere Bosch-Barceló, Cristina Bravo, Daniel Sanjuan-Sánchez, Erica Briones-Vozmediano
{"title":"Lessons Learned From Physiotherapists Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Approach.","authors":"Helena Fernández-Lago, Carolina Climent-Sanz, Maria Masbernat-Almenara, Pere Bosch-Barceló, Cristina Bravo, Daniel Sanjuan-Sánchez, Erica Briones-Vozmediano","doi":"10.1177/10482911251321740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This qualitative study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of physiotherapists related to their working situations amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Between April and June 2020, we conducted 16 semi-structured personal interviews with physiotherapists from the public, private, and insurance sectors. Using thematic analysis, we identified three themes: legislative and regulatory policies, working conditions, and employment conditions. Physiotherapists raised concerns about COVID-19 policies, confusion, and inconsistency between regional and national guidelines. Private-sector physiotherapists faced uncertainty, and public-sector physiotherapists adapted their roles to meet increased demand. Employment conditions, especially in the private sector, were precarious due to financial strain and uncertainty. Participants cited inadequate training for pandemic management. The challenges faced by physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic underscore the need for improved legislative clarity, enhanced support mechanisms, and infectious outbreak training. Future preparedness requires policies responding to professionals' needs to ensure resilience and efficacy in physiotherapy practice amid potential crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"10482911251321740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911251321740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This qualitative study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of physiotherapists related to their working situations amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Between April and June 2020, we conducted 16 semi-structured personal interviews with physiotherapists from the public, private, and insurance sectors. Using thematic analysis, we identified three themes: legislative and regulatory policies, working conditions, and employment conditions. Physiotherapists raised concerns about COVID-19 policies, confusion, and inconsistency between regional and national guidelines. Private-sector physiotherapists faced uncertainty, and public-sector physiotherapists adapted their roles to meet increased demand. Employment conditions, especially in the private sector, were precarious due to financial strain and uncertainty. Participants cited inadequate training for pandemic management. The challenges faced by physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic underscore the need for improved legislative clarity, enhanced support mechanisms, and infectious outbreak training. Future preparedness requires policies responding to professionals' needs to ensure resilience and efficacy in physiotherapy practice amid potential crises.
期刊介绍:
New Solutions delivers authoritative responses to perplexing problems, with a worker’s voice, an activist’s commitment, a scientist’s approach, and a policy-maker’s experience. New Solutions explores the growing, changing common ground at the intersection of health, work, and the environment. The Journal makes plain how the issues in each area are interrelated and sets forth progressive, thoughtfully crafted public policy choices. It seeks a conversation on the issues between the grassroots labor and environmental activists and the professionals and researchers involved in charting society’s way forward with the understanding that lack of scientific knowledge is no excuse for doing nothing and that inaction is itself a choice.