Multiparametric ultrasound for non-invasive evaluation of kidney graft function.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Maria Irene Bellini, Sergio Angeletti, Daniele Fresilli, Mattia Di Segni, Gian Marco Lo Conte, Raponi Flavia, Manuela Garofalo, Renzo Pretagostini, Corrado De Vito, Patrizia Pacini, Vito D'Andrea, Angelo Barbato, Francesco M Drudi, Marcello Caratozzolo, Cantisani Vito
{"title":"Multiparametric ultrasound for non-invasive evaluation of kidney graft function.","authors":"Maria Irene Bellini, Sergio Angeletti, Daniele Fresilli, Mattia Di Segni, Gian Marco Lo Conte, Raponi Flavia, Manuela Garofalo, Renzo Pretagostini, Corrado De Vito, Patrizia Pacini, Vito D'Andrea, Angelo Barbato, Francesco M Drudi, Marcello Caratozzolo, Cantisani Vito","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-00989-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal transplant (RT) remains the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease and early complications might be detected in the postoperative period to improve long-term outcomes. To this regard, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could be utilized to evaluate RT functional recovery and potentially detect acute rejection (AR) and/or renal ischemia signs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Observational study of 107 consecutive patients waitlisted for RT. Participants underwent conventional ultrasound (CUS) and color-doppler-ultrasound (CDUS) to evaluate resistive index of segmental and interlobar arteries and quantitative CEUS techniques recording the following perfusion parameters: peak intensity (PI-c), rising time (RT-c), area under (AUC-c) the time intensity curve (TIC), time to peak (TTP-c) and mean transit time (MTT-c).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CEUS parameters sensibility and specificity to predict AR in the early post-operative period resulted in: 90% and 69% for PI-c, 95% and 64% for RT-c, 85% and 65% for AUC-c. The overall diagnostic performance of these three CEUS parameters in comparison to the same in CUS and CDUS resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 49%, versus 85% and 46%, respectively, therefore CEUS examination with the analysis of PI-c, RT-c and AUC-c values increases the diagnostic sensitivity in predicting AR by approximately 15-20% compared to CDUS and by 30-40% compared to CUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CEUS could be routinely included in RT follow-up, as it shows to be a non-invasive helpful diagnostic tool for early detection of renal graft complications, selecting patients eventually in need of further confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-00989-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Renal transplant (RT) remains the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease and early complications might be detected in the postoperative period to improve long-term outcomes. To this regard, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could be utilized to evaluate RT functional recovery and potentially detect acute rejection (AR) and/or renal ischemia signs.

Materials and methods: Observational study of 107 consecutive patients waitlisted for RT. Participants underwent conventional ultrasound (CUS) and color-doppler-ultrasound (CDUS) to evaluate resistive index of segmental and interlobar arteries and quantitative CEUS techniques recording the following perfusion parameters: peak intensity (PI-c), rising time (RT-c), area under (AUC-c) the time intensity curve (TIC), time to peak (TTP-c) and mean transit time (MTT-c).

Results: CEUS parameters sensibility and specificity to predict AR in the early post-operative period resulted in: 90% and 69% for PI-c, 95% and 64% for RT-c, 85% and 65% for AUC-c. The overall diagnostic performance of these three CEUS parameters in comparison to the same in CUS and CDUS resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 49%, versus 85% and 46%, respectively, therefore CEUS examination with the analysis of PI-c, RT-c and AUC-c values increases the diagnostic sensitivity in predicting AR by approximately 15-20% compared to CDUS and by 30-40% compared to CUS.

Conclusion: CEUS could be routinely included in RT follow-up, as it shows to be a non-invasive helpful diagnostic tool for early detection of renal graft complications, selecting patients eventually in need of further confirmation.

多参数超声无创评价肾移植功能。
背景:肾移植(RT)仍然是终末期肾脏疾病的最佳治疗方法,术后早期并发症可能会被发现以改善长期预后。因此,造影增强超声(CEUS)可用于评估RT功能恢复,并潜在地检测急性排斥反应(AR)和/或肾缺血迹象。材料与方法:对107例连续等待rt的患者进行观察性研究。参与者采用常规超声(CUS)和彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)评估节段动脉和叶间动脉的阻力指数,定量超声技术记录灌注参数:峰值强度(PI-c)、上升时间(RT-c)、时间强度曲线下面积(auc) (TIC)、到达峰值时间(TTP-c)和平均传递时间(MTT-c)。结果:超声造影参数预测术后早期AR的敏感性和特异性:PI-c为90%和69%,RT-c为95%和64%,auc为85%和65%。这三个CEUS参数的总体诊断性能与相同的CUS和CDUS相比,灵敏度和特异性分别为95%和49%,而分别为85%和46%,因此CEUS检查与PI-c, RT-c和auc值的分析相比,预测AR的诊断敏感性比CDUS提高了约15-20%,比CUS提高了30-40%。结论:超声造影可常规纳入RT随访,是一种无创的诊断工具,有助于早期发现移植肾并发症,选择最终需要进一步确认的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信