{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fear of Cancer Scale.","authors":"Mehmet Halil Öztürk, Ahmet Doğan Kuday","doi":"10.1177/13591053251328467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS) among 285 state university students from December 2022 to February 2023. The validity analysis included language, content, and structural assessments, with structural validity examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was evaluated using item-total correlation, Cronbach's Alpha, and split-half analysis. Results confirmed that the Turkish version maintained the original factor structure, with a two-dimensional model explaining 52.73% of the variance. Factor loadings ranged from 0.455 to 0.757, and confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit. The scale showed excellent internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's Alpha of 0.920, and sub-dimension values of 0.870 for direct fear and 0.861 for indirect fear. These findings confirm the Turkish version of FOCS as a valid and reliable instrument for measuring cancer fear in non-oncological individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053251328467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251328467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS) among 285 state university students from December 2022 to February 2023. The validity analysis included language, content, and structural assessments, with structural validity examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was evaluated using item-total correlation, Cronbach's Alpha, and split-half analysis. Results confirmed that the Turkish version maintained the original factor structure, with a two-dimensional model explaining 52.73% of the variance. Factor loadings ranged from 0.455 to 0.757, and confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit. The scale showed excellent internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's Alpha of 0.920, and sub-dimension values of 0.870 for direct fear and 0.861 for indirect fear. These findings confirm the Turkish version of FOCS as a valid and reliable instrument for measuring cancer fear in non-oncological individuals.
期刊介绍：
ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
