Initiation of antipsychotic medication among refugees, non-refugee migrants, second-generation migrants, and Swedish-born adults with incident non-affective psychotic disorders.
Daniela Mellin, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Christopher J de Montgomery, Alexis E Cullen, Heidi Taipale
{"title":"Initiation of antipsychotic medication among refugees, non-refugee migrants, second-generation migrants, and Swedish-born adults with incident non-affective psychotic disorders.","authors":"Daniela Mellin, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Christopher J de Montgomery, Alexis E Cullen, Heidi Taipale","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02887-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is not known if there are differences in antipsychotic initiation between migrants and native-born individuals diagnosed with non-affective psychotic disorder. This study aimed to determine (1) potential differences in initiation rate and type of first antipsychotic medication between refugees, non-refugee migrants, second-generation migrants, and Swedish-born young adults with incident non-affective psychosis and (2) which sociodemographic and clinical factors are associated with initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This register-based cohort included 12,960 adults aged 18-35 years, residing in Sweden during 2007-2018, with an incident diagnosis of a non-affective psychotic disorder in inpatient or specialised outpatient care. Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with antipsychotic initiation were determined using modified Poisson regression models yielding Relative Risk, RRs, and 95% Confidence Intervals, CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initiation of antipsychotic use was slightly less common among refugees (65.6%) compared to non-refugee migrants (70.2%), second-generation migrants (71.0%), and Swedish-born individuals (71.1%). However, after adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical factors, there was no difference in initiation rates between refugees and Swedish-born individuals (adjusted RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.00). Olanzapine was most common initial antipsychotic in all groups. However, compared to the Swedish-born, refugees (1.47; 1.10-1.97), non-refugee migrants (1.70; 1.26-2.27) and second-generation migrants (1.43; 1.05-1.97) were more likely to initiate the use with long-acting injectable antipsychotics, and also with first-generation antipsychotics, particularly haloperidol. Sociodemographic factors associated with initiation were similar among refugees and Swedish-born individuals, including younger age, higher education and inpatient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our finding that migrants were more likely to initiate long-acting antipsychotics suggests that clinical teams anticipate medication non-adherence among migrants.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02887-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It is not known if there are differences in antipsychotic initiation between migrants and native-born individuals diagnosed with non-affective psychotic disorder. This study aimed to determine (1) potential differences in initiation rate and type of first antipsychotic medication between refugees, non-refugee migrants, second-generation migrants, and Swedish-born young adults with incident non-affective psychosis and (2) which sociodemographic and clinical factors are associated with initiation.
Methods: This register-based cohort included 12,960 adults aged 18-35 years, residing in Sweden during 2007-2018, with an incident diagnosis of a non-affective psychotic disorder in inpatient or specialised outpatient care. Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with antipsychotic initiation were determined using modified Poisson regression models yielding Relative Risk, RRs, and 95% Confidence Intervals, CI.
Results: Initiation of antipsychotic use was slightly less common among refugees (65.6%) compared to non-refugee migrants (70.2%), second-generation migrants (71.0%), and Swedish-born individuals (71.1%). However, after adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical factors, there was no difference in initiation rates between refugees and Swedish-born individuals (adjusted RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.00). Olanzapine was most common initial antipsychotic in all groups. However, compared to the Swedish-born, refugees (1.47; 1.10-1.97), non-refugee migrants (1.70; 1.26-2.27) and second-generation migrants (1.43; 1.05-1.97) were more likely to initiate the use with long-acting injectable antipsychotics, and also with first-generation antipsychotics, particularly haloperidol. Sociodemographic factors associated with initiation were similar among refugees and Swedish-born individuals, including younger age, higher education and inpatient care.
Conclusion: Our finding that migrants were more likely to initiate long-acting antipsychotics suggests that clinical teams anticipate medication non-adherence among migrants.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.