Analysis of lipoprotein (a) determination in a selection of Spanish Clinical Laboratories. Batary study.

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Teresa Arrobas Velilla, Salomon Martin Perez, Carla Fernández Prendes, Maria Jose Castro Castro, Silvia Camos Anguila, Antonio Leon Justel
{"title":"Analysis of lipoprotein (a) determination in a selection of Spanish Clinical Laboratories. Batary study.","authors":"Teresa Arrobas Velilla, Salomon Martin Perez, Carla Fernández Prendes, Maria Jose Castro Castro, Silvia Camos Anguila, Antonio Leon Justel","doi":"10.1016/j.arteri.2025.500798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lipoprotein a is considered an independent factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with high prevalence, but the availability of real and updated data in Spain as well as determination protocols are limited.</p><p><strong>Main objective: </strong>Analyze the current state of the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical process of Lp (a) and assess the relationship with other variables.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Retrospective, observational, multicenter, anonymized study carried out in 2022 by survey of clinical laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21,926 determinations were obtained corresponding to 49 Laboratories. The values obtained were: Lp(a)>30mg/dl=46.87%, Lp(a)>50mg/dl 35.31%, Lp(a)>70mg/dl=26.8% Lp(a)>90mg/dl=19.3% with predominance of superiority in female gender in all established cut-off points. Almost 30% of primary care doctors do not have access to their application. 56.9% do not have a rejection criterion. 70.6% do not have protocols for its determination. There are two predominant analytical techniques, Immunophelometry (40%) and immunoturbidimetry (60%), 24% use nmon/L, 68% mg/dL and 8% report both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a low number of patients who have Lp(a) measured and of them the percentage of patients according to risk cut-off points are higher than those described. There is a lack of uniformity in pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical processes in which it is necessary to work in a multidisciplinary manner to avoid future cardiovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":45230,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis","volume":" ","pages":"500798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arteri.2025.500798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lipoprotein a is considered an independent factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with high prevalence, but the availability of real and updated data in Spain as well as determination protocols are limited.

Main objective: Analyze the current state of the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical process of Lp (a) and assess the relationship with other variables.

Material and method: Retrospective, observational, multicenter, anonymized study carried out in 2022 by survey of clinical laboratories.

Results: 21,926 determinations were obtained corresponding to 49 Laboratories. The values obtained were: Lp(a)>30mg/dl=46.87%, Lp(a)>50mg/dl 35.31%, Lp(a)>70mg/dl=26.8% Lp(a)>90mg/dl=19.3% with predominance of superiority in female gender in all established cut-off points. Almost 30% of primary care doctors do not have access to their application. 56.9% do not have a rejection criterion. 70.6% do not have protocols for its determination. There are two predominant analytical techniques, Immunophelometry (40%) and immunoturbidimetry (60%), 24% use nmon/L, 68% mg/dL and 8% report both.

Conclusions: There is a low number of patients who have Lp(a) measured and of them the percentage of patients according to risk cut-off points are higher than those described. There is a lack of uniformity in pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical processes in which it is necessary to work in a multidisciplinary manner to avoid future cardiovascular events.

脂蛋白(a)测定在西班牙临床实验室的选择分析。Batary研究。
脂蛋白a被认为是高患病率的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的独立因素,但西班牙真实和最新数据的可用性以及测定方案有限。主要目的:分析Lp (a)的前分析、分析和后分析过程的现状,并评估其与其他变量的关系。材料与方法:回顾性、观察性、多中心、匿名研究,于2022年开展临床实验室调查。结果:49个实验室共检测21926次。所得值为:Lp(a)>30mg/dl=46.87%, Lp(a)>50mg/dl = 35.31%, Lp(a)>70mg/dl=26.8%, Lp(a)>90mg/dl=19.3%,在所有已建立的分界点上,女性优势优势明显。近30%的初级保健医生无法获得其应用程序。56.9%没有拒绝标准。70.6%没有检测方案。有两种主要的分析技术,免疫比浊法(40%)和免疫比浊法(60%),24%使用nmon/L, 68%使用mg/dL, 8%同时使用。结论:测量Lp(a)的患者数量较少,其中根据风险分界点的患者百分比高于描述的患者百分比。在分析前、分析和分析后的过程中缺乏一致性,有必要以多学科的方式工作,以避免未来的心血管事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis
Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: La publicación idónea para acceder tanto a los últimos originales de investigación como a formación médica continuada sobre la arteriosclerosis y su etiología, epidemiología, fisiopatología, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Además, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信