Exploring the perceptions of doctors with specific learning differences undertaking assessments for UK general practice licencing: a qualitative study.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Julie Pattinson, Joseph N A Akanuwe, Kim Emerson, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
{"title":"Exploring the perceptions of doctors with specific learning differences undertaking assessments for UK general practice licencing: a qualitative study.","authors":"Julie Pattinson, Joseph N A Akanuwe, Kim Emerson, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2025.2473396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increasing numbers of doctors training in the United Kingdom (UK) have specific learning differences (SpLDs) which may affect performance in licencing examinations. There is limited evidence for how and why SpLDs affect performance in licencing exams. We explored perceptions of General Practice Speciality Trainees (GPSTs) with SpLDs on the challenges of UK licencing examinations and workplace-based assessment, and strategies for overcoming these.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative design employing Systematic Grounded Theory with inductive methods to inform theory development. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed and analysed using three steps of open, axial and selective coding. We recruited from UK general practice training schemes with purposive sampling to include participants of different sex, stage of training and UK or overseas primary medical qualification.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We interviewed 18 GPSTs with a SpLD, four male and 14 female, at various stages of training, who had undergone primary medical training in the UK or overseas. We identified four core themes from the analysis: 1 Importance of early detection, screening and referral; 2 Understanding the intersection of SpLDs, culture and language; 3 Educational and organisational approaches to GP trainees with SpLDs; and 4 Addressing emotional and wellbeing impacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has identified tailored strategies to support learning and assessment for GPSTs with a SpLD, which could improve learning experiences, wellbeing and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2473396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing numbers of doctors training in the United Kingdom (UK) have specific learning differences (SpLDs) which may affect performance in licencing examinations. There is limited evidence for how and why SpLDs affect performance in licencing exams. We explored perceptions of General Practice Speciality Trainees (GPSTs) with SpLDs on the challenges of UK licencing examinations and workplace-based assessment, and strategies for overcoming these.

Methods: We used a qualitative design employing Systematic Grounded Theory with inductive methods to inform theory development. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed and analysed using three steps of open, axial and selective coding. We recruited from UK general practice training schemes with purposive sampling to include participants of different sex, stage of training and UK or overseas primary medical qualification.

Findings: We interviewed 18 GPSTs with a SpLD, four male and 14 female, at various stages of training, who had undergone primary medical training in the UK or overseas. We identified four core themes from the analysis: 1 Importance of early detection, screening and referral; 2 Understanding the intersection of SpLDs, culture and language; 3 Educational and organisational approaches to GP trainees with SpLDs; and 4 Addressing emotional and wellbeing impacts.

Conclusion: This study has identified tailored strategies to support learning and assessment for GPSTs with a SpLD, which could improve learning experiences, wellbeing and outcomes.

导言:越来越多在英国接受培训的医生存在特殊学习差异(SpLDs),这可能会影响他们在执业资格考试中的表现。关于特殊学习差异如何以及为何会影响执业资格考试成绩的证据十分有限。我们探讨了有特殊学习差异的全科专业受训人员(GPSTs)对英国执业资格考试和基于工作场所的评估所面临的挑战的看法,以及克服这些挑战的策略:我们采用了系统基础理论和归纳法的定性设计,为理论发展提供依据。我们采用开放式、轴向和选择性编码三个步骤进行了个人半结构式访谈、誊写和分析。我们从英国全科医生培训计划中进行了有目的的抽样,以包括不同性别、培训阶段和英国或海外初级医疗资格的参与者:我们采访了 18 名患有特殊语言障碍的全科医生,其中 4 名男性,14 名女性,他们处于不同的培训阶段,分别在英国或海外接受过初级医学培训。我们从分析中确定了四个核心主题:1 早期发现、筛查和转诊的重要性;2 了解特殊学习障碍、文化和语言的交叉点;3 针对有特殊学习障碍的全科医生学员的教育和组织方法;以及 4 应对情绪和健康影响:本研究确定了支持有特殊学习障碍的全科医生实习生学习和评估的定制策略,这些策略可改善学习体验、福祉和成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信