Computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory in major depressive disorder and sex differences.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qingzu Kong, Qian Liu, Feng Gao, Xiang Wang, Zhiyan Wang, Chuman Xiao, Xinyue Zhang, Qianmei Yu, Jie Fan, Xiongzhao Zhu
{"title":"Computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory in major depressive disorder and sex differences.","authors":"Qingzu Kong, Qian Liu, Feng Gao, Xiang Wang, Zhiyan Wang, Chuman Xiao, Xinyue Zhang, Qianmei Yu, Jie Fan, Xiongzhao Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02662-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory (VWM) in MDD, focusing on memory precision while exploring potential sex differences. 159 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients and 67 healthy controls (HC) completed the color delay estimation task to measure their VWM. The mainstream models of VWM were compared, and the variable-precision (VP) model was the best fit for our data. The Bayesian ANCOVA was used to compare the differences between groups (MDD & HC) and sexes (male & female). Results revealed that MDD had worse memory precision than HC (BF<sub>10</sub> = 103.872, decisive evidence for H<sub>1</sub>). Specifically, they had larger resource allocation variability (BF<sub>10</sub> = 19.421, strong evidence for H<sub>1</sub>), indicating that they distributed memory resources more unevenly across different items than HC. In addition, females had better memory precision than males (BF<sub>10</sub> = 10.548, strong evidence for H<sub>1</sub>). More specifically, they had more initial resources during the color delay estimation task (BF<sub>10</sub> = 6.003, substantial evidence for H<sub>1</sub>) than males. These findings highlight the critical role of diminished precision, specifically, larger resource allocation variability, in impaired VWM in MDD. Meanwhile, these findings highlight sex differences in memory precision and initial resources of VWM.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02662-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory (VWM) in MDD, focusing on memory precision while exploring potential sex differences. 159 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients and 67 healthy controls (HC) completed the color delay estimation task to measure their VWM. The mainstream models of VWM were compared, and the variable-precision (VP) model was the best fit for our data. The Bayesian ANCOVA was used to compare the differences between groups (MDD & HC) and sexes (male & female). Results revealed that MDD had worse memory precision than HC (BF10 = 103.872, decisive evidence for H1). Specifically, they had larger resource allocation variability (BF10 = 19.421, strong evidence for H1), indicating that they distributed memory resources more unevenly across different items than HC. In addition, females had better memory precision than males (BF10 = 10.548, strong evidence for H1). More specifically, they had more initial resources during the color delay estimation task (BF10 = 6.003, substantial evidence for H1) than males. These findings highlight the critical role of diminished precision, specifically, larger resource allocation variability, in impaired VWM in MDD. Meanwhile, these findings highlight sex differences in memory precision and initial resources of VWM.

本研究探讨了多发性抑郁症患者视觉工作记忆(VWM)的计算认知机制,重点关注记忆精度,同时探索潜在的性别差异。159名重度抑郁症(MDD)患者和67名健康对照组(HC)完成了颜色延迟估计任务,以测量他们的视觉工作记忆。我们比较了VWM的主流模型,发现可变精度(VP)模型最适合我们的数据。贝叶斯方差分析用于比较不同组别(MDD 和 HC)和性别(男性和女性)之间的差异。结果显示,MDD 的记忆精度比 HC 差(BF10 = 103.872,H1 的决定性证据)。具体来说,他们的资源分配变异性更大(BF10 = 19.421,H1的有力证据),这表明他们在不同项目上的记忆资源分配比HC更不均匀。此外,女性的记忆精确度比男性高(BF10 = 10.548,H1 的有力证据)。更具体地说,在颜色延迟估计任务中,女性比男性拥有更多的初始资源(BF10 = 6.003,H1 的有力证据)。这些发现凸显了精确度降低,特别是资源分配变异性增大,在多发性硬化症患者VWM受损中的关键作用。同时,这些发现还突显了记忆精度和VWM初始资源的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信