From shortages to solutions: Liquid plasma as a practical alternative to whole blood for prehospital trauma resuscitation.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1111/trf.18183
Aashish Rajesh, Randall M Schaefer, Jon R Krohmer, Eric A Bank, John B Holcomb, Donald H Jenkins
{"title":"From shortages to solutions: Liquid plasma as a practical alternative to whole blood for prehospital trauma resuscitation.","authors":"Aashish Rajesh, Randall M Schaefer, Jon R Krohmer, Eric A Bank, John B Holcomb, Donald H Jenkins","doi":"10.1111/trf.18183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock remains a leading cause of preventable mortality, necessitating timely and effective resuscitation strategies. While low-titer O whole blood (LTOWB) is the preferred choice for prehospital resuscitation due to its balanced composition and ease of use, overall widespread implementation is hindered by persistent supply chain issues and daily logistical challenges of access and deployment. Platelets, containing plasma as a component, are considered the next best alternative to LTOWB but are constrained by their short shelf life and ongoing scarcity, and ongoing storage compliance, rendering their use impractical. This review evaluates plasma-based alternatives, particularly liquid plasma (LP), as a viable and cost-effective substitute therapeutic modality. LP offers a 26-day refrigerated shelf life compared to the 5-day limit of thawed fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and eliminates the challenges associated with freezing and thawing while maintaining clinical efficacy. Preliminary economic analyses further underscore the advantages of LP, demonstrating reduced wastage and lower costs compared to LTOWB, especially when partnering with a hospital system. Acknowledging the barriers in implementing prehospital blood transfusion programs due to blood supply and costs, we advocate for emergency medical service (EMS) adoption of LP, highlighting its availability, comparable efficacy to LTOWB, and cost-effectiveness. Until LTOWB becomes more accessible, LP should be prioritized in prehospital care to optimize outcomes for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock remains a leading cause of preventable mortality, necessitating timely and effective resuscitation strategies. While low-titer O whole blood (LTOWB) is the preferred choice for prehospital resuscitation due to its balanced composition and ease of use, overall widespread implementation is hindered by persistent supply chain issues and daily logistical challenges of access and deployment. Platelets, containing plasma as a component, are considered the next best alternative to LTOWB but are constrained by their short shelf life and ongoing scarcity, and ongoing storage compliance, rendering their use impractical. This review evaluates plasma-based alternatives, particularly liquid plasma (LP), as a viable and cost-effective substitute therapeutic modality. LP offers a 26-day refrigerated shelf life compared to the 5-day limit of thawed fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and eliminates the challenges associated with freezing and thawing while maintaining clinical efficacy. Preliminary economic analyses further underscore the advantages of LP, demonstrating reduced wastage and lower costs compared to LTOWB, especially when partnering with a hospital system. Acknowledging the barriers in implementing prehospital blood transfusion programs due to blood supply and costs, we advocate for emergency medical service (EMS) adoption of LP, highlighting its availability, comparable efficacy to LTOWB, and cost-effectiveness. Until LTOWB becomes more accessible, LP should be prioritized in prehospital care to optimize outcomes for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock.

从短缺到解决方案:液体血浆作为全血的实用替代品用于院前创伤复苏。
创伤性失血性休克仍然是可预防死亡的主要原因,需要及时有效的复苏策略。低滴度O型全血(LTOWB)因其成分均衡且易于使用而成为院前复苏的首选,但持续存在的供应链问题以及获取和部署方面的日常后勤挑战阻碍了其全面广泛实施。含有血浆成分的血小板被认为是LTOWB的下一个最佳替代品,但由于其保质期短、持续的稀缺性和持续的存储依从性,使得其使用不现实。这篇综述评估了基于血浆的替代品,特别是液体血浆(LP),作为一种可行且具有成本效益的替代治疗方式。与解冻新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)的5天限制相比,LP提供了26天的冷藏保质期,在保持临床疗效的同时消除了与冷冻和解冻相关的挑战。初步的经济分析进一步强调了LP的优势,表明与LTOWB相比,LP减少了浪费,降低了成本,特别是在与医院系统合作时。由于血液供应和成本的原因,在实施院前输血计划方面存在障碍,我们提倡急诊医疗服务(EMS)采用LP,强调其可获得性、与LTOWB相当的疗效和成本效益。在LTOWB变得更容易获得之前,LP应优先用于院前护理,以优化失血性休克创伤患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信