Outcomes of implants placed in grafted sinuses in comparison with other regions.

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Quintessence international Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b6120629

Yung-Ting Hsu, Ida Zarrabi, Saumya Prajapati, Shale Ninneman, Diane Daubert, I-Chung Wang, Nelly Badr

{"title":"Outcomes of implants placed in grafted sinuses in comparison with other regions.","authors":"Yung-Ting Hsu, Ida Zarrabi, Saumya Prajapati, Shale Ninneman, Diane Daubert, I-Chung Wang, Nelly Badr","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6120629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in marginal bone level (MBL) and survival rates of implants (ISR) placed in lateral-window sinus floor elevation (LSFE) sites compared to other sites.Method and materials: Patient with a history of LSFE and following implant placement were identified. Clinical and radiographic data was collected by 2 calibrated examiners and divided into three cohorts for the analysis, including (1) implants placed in the LSFE-grafted sinus, (2) implants placed in the maxilla at sites other than grafted sinus, and (3) implants placed in the mandible. ISR and MBL were recorded and calculated. The potential influences of several host, implant, and surgically related factors on ISR and MBL were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.Results: 427 implants from 99 patients (63.8 ±12.5 years) with an average follow-up period of 32.3 ±29.2 months were analyzed. The cumulative ISR at the grafted sinuses was 93.63%. Mean MBL was 0.44 ± 0.79 mm, 0.84 ±1.21 mm, and 0.85 ±1.16 mm for implants in group 1 (n= 142), group 2 (n=129), and group 3 (n=147) (p=0.01). The majority of MBL occurred within the first 12 months after implant placement. The status of smoking and periodontal disease did not impact ISR or MBL for any group (P>0.05). Neither sinus membrane perforation (SMP) or grafting materials affected MBL (P>0.05) in group 1.Conclusion: The utilization of LSFE and the presence of SMP during LSFE had no negative impact on implant outcomes.","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6120629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in marginal bone level (MBL) and survival rates of implants (ISR) placed in lateral-window sinus floor elevation (LSFE) sites compared to other sites.

Method and materials: Patient with a history of LSFE and following implant placement were identified. Clinical and radiographic data was collected by 2 calibrated examiners and divided into three cohorts for the analysis, including (1) implants placed in the LSFE-grafted sinus, (2) implants placed in the maxilla at sites other than grafted sinus, and (3) implants placed in the mandible. ISR and MBL were recorded and calculated. The potential influences of several host, implant, and surgically related factors on ISR and MBL were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.

Results: 427 implants from 99 patients (63.8 ±12.5 years) with an average follow-up period of 32.3 ±29.2 months were analyzed. The cumulative ISR at the grafted sinuses was 93.63%. Mean MBL was 0.44 ± 0.79 mm, 0.84 ±1.21 mm, and 0.85 ±1.16 mm for implants in group 1 (n= 142), group 2 (n=129), and group 3 (n=147) (p=0.01). The majority of MBL occurred within the first 12 months after implant placement. The status of smoking and periodontal disease did not impact ISR or MBL for any group (P>0.05). Neither sinus membrane perforation (SMP) or grafting materials affected MBL (P>0.05) in group 1.

Conclusion: The utilization of LSFE and the presence of SMP during LSFE had no negative impact on implant outcomes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.