Intermediate Grade Salivary Gland Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: Is Neck Dissection Indicated?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jake Langlie, Nicholas DiStefano, Carmen Gomez-Fernandez, Jaylou Velez-Torres, Jason Leibowitz, David Arnold, Donald Weed, Francisco J Civantos
{"title":"Intermediate Grade Salivary Gland Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: Is Neck Dissection Indicated?","authors":"Jake Langlie, Nicholas DiStefano, Carmen Gomez-Fernandez, Jaylou Velez-Torres, Jason Leibowitz, David Arnold, Donald Weed, Francisco J Civantos","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>NCCN guidelines recommend a neck dissection addressing at least levels II-IV for high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and close observation of the lymphatic basins for low-grade MEC. However, no guidelines exist for intermediate-grade MEC with clinically and radiologically uninvolved cervical lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patients with intermediate-grade MEC with a clinically N0 neck from our tertiary academic institution from 2015 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evaluation for histologic lymphatic metastases was performed when surgeons elected to perform neck dissection. For patients who did not receive a neck dissection, review of medical records to document the results of clinical observation, and specifically regional lymphatic recurrence, on long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five patients with N0 intermediate grade MEC were included, composed of 26 patients who underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection and 9 patients who received resection of the primary tumor without neck dissection. One out of 26 patients receiving neck dissection was found to have lymphatic metastasis. Watchful waiting of 9 patients demonstrated no recurrence at a mean follow up of 40 months. Thus, 1 out of 35 patients (2.9% [95% confidence interval: 2.7%-3.1%]) had documented metastatic disease in the lymphatics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients presenting with intermediate-grade MEC, there was a low chance (2.9%) of positive histologic or clinical lymphatic metastases in the neck. Given this low risk, we believe the potential benefit of neck dissection may be outweighed by the potential morbidity. Careful consideration of the clinical behavior of the lesion could be considered along with a more selective approach toward elective lymphadenectomy in intermediate-grade MEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: NCCN guidelines recommend a neck dissection addressing at least levels II-IV for high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and close observation of the lymphatic basins for low-grade MEC. However, no guidelines exist for intermediate-grade MEC with clinically and radiologically uninvolved cervical lymph nodes.

Study design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Patients with intermediate-grade MEC with a clinically N0 neck from our tertiary academic institution from 2015 to 2023.

Methods: Evaluation for histologic lymphatic metastases was performed when surgeons elected to perform neck dissection. For patients who did not receive a neck dissection, review of medical records to document the results of clinical observation, and specifically regional lymphatic recurrence, on long-term follow-up.

Results: Thirty-five patients with N0 intermediate grade MEC were included, composed of 26 patients who underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection and 9 patients who received resection of the primary tumor without neck dissection. One out of 26 patients receiving neck dissection was found to have lymphatic metastasis. Watchful waiting of 9 patients demonstrated no recurrence at a mean follow up of 40 months. Thus, 1 out of 35 patients (2.9% [95% confidence interval: 2.7%-3.1%]) had documented metastatic disease in the lymphatics.

Conclusions: For patients presenting with intermediate-grade MEC, there was a low chance (2.9%) of positive histologic or clinical lymphatic metastases in the neck. Given this low risk, we believe the potential benefit of neck dissection may be outweighed by the potential morbidity. Careful consideration of the clinical behavior of the lesion could be considered along with a more selective approach toward elective lymphadenectomy in intermediate-grade MEC.

中级唾液腺粘液表皮样癌:是否需要颈部清扫?
目的:NCCN指南建议对高级别黏液表皮样癌(MEC)进行至少II-IV级的颈部清扫,对低级别MEC进行淋巴池密切观察。然而,对于临床上和影像学上未累及颈部淋巴结的中度MEC,尚无指南。研究设计:回顾性分析。研究对象:2015年至2023年来自我院高等院校的中度MEC患者,临床颈型为0。方法:当外科医生选择进行颈部清扫时,对组织学淋巴转移进行评估。对于未接受颈部清扫的患者,回顾医疗记录以记录临床观察结果,特别是区域性淋巴复发,并进行长期随访。结果:纳入35例N0中度MEC患者,其中26例行原发肿瘤切除术合并颈部清扫,9例行原发肿瘤切除术合并颈部清扫。26例接受颈部清扫的患者中有1例发现有淋巴转移。9例患者观察等待,平均随访40个月无复发。因此,35例患者中有1例(2.9%[95%可信区间:2.7%-3.1%])证实存在淋巴转移性疾病。结论:对于中度MEC患者,颈部出现组织学或临床淋巴转移的几率较低(2.9%)。鉴于这种低风险,我们认为颈部清扫术的潜在益处可能被潜在的发病率所抵消。对于中度MEC患者,应仔细考虑病变的临床表现,并采取更有选择性的选择性淋巴结切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信