Time Toxicity: Quantifying Healthcare Utilization Attributable to Pediatric Home Ventilation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Emily D Johnson, Renee D Boss, Woo Yeon Park, Khyzer B Aziz
{"title":"Time Toxicity: Quantifying Healthcare Utilization Attributable to Pediatric Home Ventilation.","authors":"Emily D Johnson, Renee D Boss, Woo Yeon Park, Khyzer B Aziz","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the \"time toxicity,\" or time burden patients experience when pursuing health-related interventions, of pediatric invasive home ventilation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified all patients from a single neonatal intensive care unit who received a tracheostomy with/without home ventilation (T + /-HV) from 2016 to 2024. After matching the gestational week distribution of this cohort, five controls were randomly selected for each T + /-HV patient. Healthcare encounters in the electronic medical record were compared for the cohort versus controls. All encounters on a single calendar day were counted as 1 day of healthcare utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 62 patients with T + /-HV and 310 controls. Mortality was 35.5% among the T + /-HV cohort and 9% among controls. Median inpatient hospitalizations (7.0 vs. 2.0), total healthcare encounters (64.0 vs. 15.5), days of healthcare utilization (296 vs. 46), and healthcare utilization ratio (0.4 vs. 0.1) were all significantly higher for the T + /-HV cohort compared with controls. Differences were greatest in the first year of life. Among survivors in the T + /-HV cohort, decannulated patients had significantly greater healthcare utilization than those not decannulated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This proof-of-concept analysis quantified \"time toxicity\" for pediatric invasive home ventilation and demonstrated that neonates who receive a tracheostomy during their initial admission spent over half of all days in their first 2 years of life interacting with the healthcare system. \"Time toxicity\" could add objective information to better prepare families for what life looks like with a child using a ventilator at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 4","pages":"e71081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Determine the "time toxicity," or time burden patients experience when pursuing health-related interventions, of pediatric invasive home ventilation.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Methods: We identified all patients from a single neonatal intensive care unit who received a tracheostomy with/without home ventilation (T + /-HV) from 2016 to 2024. After matching the gestational week distribution of this cohort, five controls were randomly selected for each T + /-HV patient. Healthcare encounters in the electronic medical record were compared for the cohort versus controls. All encounters on a single calendar day were counted as 1 day of healthcare utilization.

Results: We identified 62 patients with T + /-HV and 310 controls. Mortality was 35.5% among the T + /-HV cohort and 9% among controls. Median inpatient hospitalizations (7.0 vs. 2.0), total healthcare encounters (64.0 vs. 15.5), days of healthcare utilization (296 vs. 46), and healthcare utilization ratio (0.4 vs. 0.1) were all significantly higher for the T + /-HV cohort compared with controls. Differences were greatest in the first year of life. Among survivors in the T + /-HV cohort, decannulated patients had significantly greater healthcare utilization than those not decannulated.

Conclusions: This proof-of-concept analysis quantified "time toxicity" for pediatric invasive home ventilation and demonstrated that neonates who receive a tracheostomy during their initial admission spent over half of all days in their first 2 years of life interacting with the healthcare system. "Time toxicity" could add objective information to better prepare families for what life looks like with a child using a ventilator at home.

时间毒性:量化儿科家庭通风引起的医疗保健使用。
目的:确定儿童有创家庭通气的“时间毒性”,即患者在进行健康相关干预时所经历的时间负担。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。方法:选取2016年至2024年在单一新生儿重症监护室接受气管切开术(T + /-HV)的所有患者。在匹配该队列的妊娠周分布后,为每个T + /-HV患者随机选择5个对照。将电子医疗记录中的医疗保健遭遇与队列与对照组进行比较。在一个日历日的所有就诊被计算为1天的医疗保健利用。结果:我们确定了62例T + /-HV患者和310例对照。T + /-HV组死亡率为35.5%,对照组为9%。与对照组相比,T + /-HV组的住院中位数(7.0比2.0)、医疗保健总就诊次数(64.0比15.5)、医疗保健利用天数(296比46)和医疗保健利用率(0.4比0.1)均显著高于对照组。差异在生命的第一年最大。在T + /-HV队列的幸存者中,去环管患者的医疗保健利用率明显高于未去环管患者。结论:这一概念验证分析量化了儿科有创家庭通气的“时间毒性”,并证明在首次入院时接受气管切开术的新生儿在其生命的前2年里花费了超过一半的时间与医疗保健系统互动。“时间毒性”可以增加客观信息,让家庭更好地为孩子在家使用呼吸机的生活做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信