Clinical and radiological activity after extended interval and standard interval dosing of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mahsa Ghajarzadeh, Mohsen Rastkar, Ellen M Mowry, Bardia Nourbakhsh
{"title":"Clinical and radiological activity after extended interval and standard interval dosing of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mahsa Ghajarzadeh, Mohsen Rastkar, Ellen M Mowry, Bardia Nourbakhsh","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08098-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ocrelizumab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is highly effective in reducing MS clinical and radiological activity. The standard dosing regimen consists of infusing 600 mg of ocrelizumab every six months. However, concerns about increasing risks of infection and lowered vaccine response, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, prompted clinicians to extend the dosing interval between ocrelizumab infusions for some patients. Several observational studies have compared the effects of extended-interval dosing (EID) and standardinterval dosing (SID) of ocrelizumab on MS relapse rate and MRI activity.  METHOD: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature to summarize studies comparing ocrelizumab EID and SID on MS disease activity in patients with MS. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar on the 1st of June 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic search revealed 348 records, and after deleting duplicates, 29 records remained. Twenty-eight full texts were evaluated; ultimately, 16 studies remained for systematic review. In this meta-analysis, extended interval dosing (EID) was defined variably across studies, with some considering even a one-month delay as EID. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) for clinical and MRI activity, comparing ocrelizumab EID to SID groups, were estimated as 1.04 (95%CI: 0.67-1.6, I2=30%, P=0.21) and 1.31(95%CI: 0.90-1.92) (I2=15%, P=0.32), respectively.  CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that ocrelizumab EID is not associated with greater odds of clinical and radiological disease activity in patients with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08098-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ocrelizumab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is highly effective in reducing MS clinical and radiological activity. The standard dosing regimen consists of infusing 600 mg of ocrelizumab every six months. However, concerns about increasing risks of infection and lowered vaccine response, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, prompted clinicians to extend the dosing interval between ocrelizumab infusions for some patients. Several observational studies have compared the effects of extended-interval dosing (EID) and standardinterval dosing (SID) of ocrelizumab on MS relapse rate and MRI activity.  METHOD: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature to summarize studies comparing ocrelizumab EID and SID on MS disease activity in patients with MS. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar on the 1st of June 2024.

Results: Our systematic search revealed 348 records, and after deleting duplicates, 29 records remained. Twenty-eight full texts were evaluated; ultimately, 16 studies remained for systematic review. In this meta-analysis, extended interval dosing (EID) was defined variably across studies, with some considering even a one-month delay as EID. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) for clinical and MRI activity, comparing ocrelizumab EID to SID groups, were estimated as 1.04 (95%CI: 0.67-1.6, I2=30%, P=0.21) and 1.31(95%CI: 0.90-1.92) (I2=15%, P=0.32), respectively.  CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that ocrelizumab EID is not associated with greater odds of clinical and radiological disease activity in patients with MS.

多发性硬化症患者延长间隔用药和标准间隔用药后的临床和放射学活性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:奥克雷珠单抗是一种抗 CD20 单克隆抗体,在降低多发性硬化症的临床和放射学活动方面非常有效。标准给药方案包括每六个月输注 600 毫克奥柯利珠单抗。然而,由于担心感染风险增加和疫苗反应降低,特别是在 COVID-19 大流行期间,临床医生延长了部分患者输注奥柯利珠单抗的间隔时间。有几项观察性研究比较了延长间隔给药(EID)和标准间隔给药(SID)对多发性硬化复发率和磁共振成像活动的影响。 方法:我们对现有文献进行了系统性回顾和荟萃分析,总结了比较奥柯利珠单抗 EID 和 SID 对多发性硬化症患者疾病活动性影响的研究。两位独立审稿人于 2024 年 6 月 1 日检索了 PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar:我们的系统性检索发现了 348 条记录,删除重复记录后,还剩下 29 条记录。我们对 28 篇全文进行了评估,最终剩下 16 篇研究进行了系统综述。在这项荟萃分析中,各研究对延长间隔给药(EID)的定义不尽相同,有些研究甚至将延迟一个月也视为 EID。将奥克雷珠单抗 EID 组与 SID 组进行比较,临床和 MRI 活动性的汇总几率比(ORs)分别估计为 1.04(95%CI:0.67-1.6,I2=30%,P=0.21)和 1.31(95%CI:0.90-1.92)(I2=15%,P=0.32)。 结论:该系统综述和荟萃分析表明,奥克雷珠单抗 EID 与多发性硬化症患者临床和放射学疾病活动几率增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信