Mediators of the causal associations between protein ratios and ischemic stroke: a two-step Mendelian randomization study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Haozhou Tan, Hao Chen, Han Yan, Fangfang Li, Yang Yao, Ying Li, Qian Feng
{"title":"Mediators of the causal associations between protein ratios and ischemic stroke: a two-step Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Haozhou Tan, Hao Chen, Han Yan, Fangfang Li, Yang Yao, Ying Li, Qian Feng","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2487867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proteomics has revealed links between plasma proteins and ischemic stroke (IS), but the relationship between protein ratios, IS, and the effects of blood cells and serum uric acid (SUA) is underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), we assessed causal relationships between 2,821 protein ratios, 91 blood phenotypes, SUA, and IS subtypes. FDR correction was applied specifically to protein ratio analyses to account for multiple comparisons in the primary MR step. Significant associations were further validated through co-localization analysis, which assessed shared genetic architecture between exposure and outcome loci. This analysis used GWAS data from MEGASTROKE, GISCOME, minimizing confounding bias and reverse causation. Additionally, the total effects of protein ratio levels on IS were decomposed into direct and indirect effects mediated through multiple pathways. Sensitivity analyses ensured robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CD34/ITGAV ratio exhibited distinct effects on stroke risk, showing 34.9% increased odds of LAS (OR=1.349, 95% CI=1.097-1.658) while demonstrating protective effects against IS outcome progression (OR=0.564, 95% CI=0.380-0.838). Bayesian co-localization analysis revealed complete genetic overlap (PPH4 = 1) for key protein ratio-stroke subtype pairs: AIS with TGFBR2/THBD ratio, LAS with LGALS8/VWF ratio, CES with BST2/CEACAM1 and CD209/CLEC4G ratios. In mediation pathways, neutrophil parameters accounted for 54.4% of the prognosis effect in the ABHD14B/STAMBP-IS association, whereas SUA mediated only 1.3% of the PODXL2/SDC1 ratio-IS relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our MR study combined with co-localization analysis identifies causal links between protein interactions and IS, highlighting potential targets to disrupt pathways connecting protein ratio changes to IS incidence and outcomes, offering promising intervention avenues.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2487867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proteomics has revealed links between plasma proteins and ischemic stroke (IS), but the relationship between protein ratios, IS, and the effects of blood cells and serum uric acid (SUA) is underexplored.

Methods: Using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), we assessed causal relationships between 2,821 protein ratios, 91 blood phenotypes, SUA, and IS subtypes. FDR correction was applied specifically to protein ratio analyses to account for multiple comparisons in the primary MR step. Significant associations were further validated through co-localization analysis, which assessed shared genetic architecture between exposure and outcome loci. This analysis used GWAS data from MEGASTROKE, GISCOME, minimizing confounding bias and reverse causation. Additionally, the total effects of protein ratio levels on IS were decomposed into direct and indirect effects mediated through multiple pathways. Sensitivity analyses ensured robustness.

Results: The CD34/ITGAV ratio exhibited distinct effects on stroke risk, showing 34.9% increased odds of LAS (OR=1.349, 95% CI=1.097-1.658) while demonstrating protective effects against IS outcome progression (OR=0.564, 95% CI=0.380-0.838). Bayesian co-localization analysis revealed complete genetic overlap (PPH4 = 1) for key protein ratio-stroke subtype pairs: AIS with TGFBR2/THBD ratio, LAS with LGALS8/VWF ratio, CES with BST2/CEACAM1 and CD209/CLEC4G ratios. In mediation pathways, neutrophil parameters accounted for 54.4% of the prognosis effect in the ABHD14B/STAMBP-IS association, whereas SUA mediated only 1.3% of the PODXL2/SDC1 ratio-IS relationship.

Conclusions: Our MR study combined with co-localization analysis identifies causal links between protein interactions and IS, highlighting potential targets to disrupt pathways connecting protein ratio changes to IS incidence and outcomes, offering promising intervention avenues.

蛋白质比率与缺血性中风之间因果关系的中介因素:两步孟德尔随机研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Research
Neurological Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields. The scope of the journal includes: •Stem cell applications •Molecular neuroscience •Neuropharmacology •Neuroradiology •Neurochemistry •Biomathematical models •Endovascular neurosurgery •Innovation in neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信