Spinal Cord Tract Integrity in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Newton Cho, Abdul Al-Shawwa, W Bradley Jacobs, Nathan Evaniew, Jacques Bouchard, Steve Casha, Stephan duPlessis, Peter Lewkonia, Fred Nicholls, Alex Soroceanu, Ganesh Swamy, Kenneth C Thomas, Michael M H Yang, Julien Cohen-Adad, David W Cadotte
{"title":"Spinal Cord Tract Integrity in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.","authors":"Newton Cho, Abdul Al-Shawwa, W Bradley Jacobs, Nathan Evaniew, Jacques Bouchard, Steve Casha, Stephan duPlessis, Peter Lewkonia, Fred Nicholls, Alex Soroceanu, Ganesh Swamy, Kenneth C Thomas, Michael M H Yang, Julien Cohen-Adad, David W Cadotte","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal dysfunction globally. Despite surgical intervention, motor dysfunction may persist in many patients. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively examine specific spinal cord tract changes in patients with DCM, to better understand potential substrates for compensatory recovery of function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cervical spinal cord MRI scans with diffusion tensor imaging were performed in patients with DCM and in healthy volunteers. Spinal Cord Toolbox was used to register the PAM50 template, which includes a probabilistic atlas of the white matter tracts of the spinal cord, to the imaging data. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was extracted for each tract at C3 above the level of maximal compression and compared between patients with DCM and healthy volunteers and between patients with mild vs moderate to severe DCM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 25 patients with DCM (13 mild and 12 moderate to severe) and 6 healthy volunteers. FA was significantly reduced in DCM subjects relative to healthy volunteers for the lateral corticospinal tract (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.13, P = .018; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.11, P = .047), fasciculus gracilis (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.16, P = .010; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.13, P = .039), and fasciculus cuneatus (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.16, P = .007; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.15, P = .012). There were no differences in FA for all tracts between mild and moderate-to-severe DCM subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with DCM had altered diffusion tensor imaging signal in their lateral corticospinal tract, fasciculus gracilis, and fasciculus cuneatus in comparison with healthy volunteers. These findings indicate that DCM is characterized by injury to these structures, which suggests that other tracts within the cord could potentially act as substrates for compensatory motor recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal dysfunction globally. Despite surgical intervention, motor dysfunction may persist in many patients. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively examine specific spinal cord tract changes in patients with DCM, to better understand potential substrates for compensatory recovery of function.

Methods: Cervical spinal cord MRI scans with diffusion tensor imaging were performed in patients with DCM and in healthy volunteers. Spinal Cord Toolbox was used to register the PAM50 template, which includes a probabilistic atlas of the white matter tracts of the spinal cord, to the imaging data. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was extracted for each tract at C3 above the level of maximal compression and compared between patients with DCM and healthy volunteers and between patients with mild vs moderate to severe DCM.

Results: We included 25 patients with DCM (13 mild and 12 moderate to severe) and 6 healthy volunteers. FA was significantly reduced in DCM subjects relative to healthy volunteers for the lateral corticospinal tract (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.13, P = .018; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.11, P = .047), fasciculus gracilis (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.16, P = .010; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.13, P = .039), and fasciculus cuneatus (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.16, P = .007; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.15, P = .012). There were no differences in FA for all tracts between mild and moderate-to-severe DCM subjects.

Conclusion: Patients with DCM had altered diffusion tensor imaging signal in their lateral corticospinal tract, fasciculus gracilis, and fasciculus cuneatus in comparison with healthy volunteers. These findings indicate that DCM is characterized by injury to these structures, which suggests that other tracts within the cord could potentially act as substrates for compensatory motor recovery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信