{"title":"An examination of the interrelationships among NASA-TLX dimensions utilizing the DEMATEL method.","authors":"Şeniz Harputlu Aksu, Aylin Adem, Erman Çakıt, Metin Dağdeviren, Waldemar Karwowski","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0320638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The NASA TLX is a survey-based method widely used to evaluate cognitive workload across six specific dimensions related to an employee's tasks. While academic research recognizes that these dimensions may have unequal contributions to mental workload, they are often weighted using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. However, prior studies have not investigated possible relationships between the dimensions. The main objective of this paper is to explore the interconnections and dependencies among these dimensions. This study distinguishes itself by employing the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) technique to clarify these relationships and dependencies, and to examine how interactions between dimensions shift under different threshold conditions. The research includes three distinct impact diagrams tailored for individuals performing tasks with varying levels of cognitive workload. By considering the interdependencies among the NASA TLX dimensions, this study offers a significant advancement in the field, as these interrelationships could greatly influence the derived weights. This theoretical contribution has the potential to be groundbreaking in the realm of survey-based mental workload assessment techniques, such as the NASA TLX.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 4","pages":"e0320638"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320638","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The NASA TLX is a survey-based method widely used to evaluate cognitive workload across six specific dimensions related to an employee's tasks. While academic research recognizes that these dimensions may have unequal contributions to mental workload, they are often weighted using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. However, prior studies have not investigated possible relationships between the dimensions. The main objective of this paper is to explore the interconnections and dependencies among these dimensions. This study distinguishes itself by employing the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) technique to clarify these relationships and dependencies, and to examine how interactions between dimensions shift under different threshold conditions. The research includes three distinct impact diagrams tailored for individuals performing tasks with varying levels of cognitive workload. By considering the interdependencies among the NASA TLX dimensions, this study offers a significant advancement in the field, as these interrelationships could greatly influence the derived weights. This theoretical contribution has the potential to be groundbreaking in the realm of survey-based mental workload assessment techniques, such as the NASA TLX.
NASA TLX 是一种基于调查的方法,广泛用于评估与员工任务相关的六个特定维度的认知工作量。虽然学术研究承认这些维度对心理工作量的贡献可能不均等,但通常会使用多标准决策技术对它们进行加权。然而,之前的研究并未调查这些维度之间可能存在的关系。本文的主要目的是探讨这些维度之间的相互联系和依赖关系。本研究与众不同之处在于采用了决策试验和评估实验室(DEMATEL)技术来阐明这些关系和依赖性,并研究在不同的阈值条件下,各维度之间的相互作用是如何变化的。研究包括三个不同的影响图,分别针对执行不同认知工作量任务的个人。通过考虑 NASA TLX 各维度之间的相互依存关系,本研究在该领域取得了重大进展,因为这些相互关系会极大地影响得出的权重。这一理论贡献有可能在基于调查的心理工作量评估技术(如 NASA TLX)领域具有开创性意义。
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage